Dragos Nicolae Madaras vs Clement Geens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Madaras vs Geens analysis and find out who is favored!
Dragos Nicolae Madaras vs Clement Geens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Madaras has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Geens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Madaras, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Geens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Madaras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Geens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Madaras has won 75.56% of matches played (W/L 34/ 11), with Geens winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Madaras has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 295/ 139), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Geens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 49/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Madaras has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 93.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 2), where as Geens has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Madaras winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Madaras winning 2 and Geens winning 0. The last match between Madaras and Geens was at the Belgium F3 (Lasne), 05-07-2018, Second, Clay with Dragos Nicolae Madaras getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Madaras and Geens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Madaras winning 0 times and Geens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Madaras winning 0, and Geens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Madaras has played against opponents with an average rank of 245.42 while Geens has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Madaras has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Geens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Madaras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Geens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Madaras 1 - 0 Geens
19
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
326
Rank
191
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
245
High
28
Age
R
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
66% (324-165)
Career Total W/L
61% (228-144)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$42,460
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Dragos Nicolae Madaras | Clement Geens |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 8 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:1:0 | 1:1:0 |
1st Serve % | 80% (37/46) | 59% (19/32) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (22/37) | 37% (7/19) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (5/9) | 46% (6/13) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 14% (1/7) |
Return Points W% | 59% (19/32) | 41% (19/46) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 2-0 ret. |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Clement Geens
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
46
Total Points Won
32
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Dragos Nicolae Madaras | Clement Geens |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Marko Topo
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Marco Cecchinato
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luca Van Assche
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cristian Garin
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Sebastian Gima
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Clement Geens Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Clement Geens
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
46
Total Points Won
53
|
3-6 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Geens
Player
Benjamin Hassan
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clement Geens
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Geens
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clement Geens
Player
Lenny Hampel
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
73
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Geens
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Alexis Musialek
Player
Clement Geens
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
44%
(
7 of
16)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
45%
(
5 of
11)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
20
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Geens
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clement Geens
Player
Zizou Bergs
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Geens
Player
Eleftherios Theodorou
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more