Dominik Kellovsky vs Blake Mott Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W W W L
Form
W W L W W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Kellovsky 1 - 0 Mott
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kellovsky winning 2 and Mott winning 0. The last match between Kellovsky and Mott was at the M15 Heraklion, 04-04-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Dominik Kellovsky getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dominik Kellovsky | 1 |
| Blake Mott | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Heraklion(04-04-2025)
Dominik Kellovsky
Blake Mott
6
1
7
5
| Kellovsky | Stats | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (19-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (11-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 545 | Ranking | 514 |
| 468 | Highest Rank | 220 |
| 28 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 5 |
| 55% (294-237) | Career Total W/L | 57% (255-191) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $133,500 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Todoni VS Pegula PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sramkova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Blake Mott
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:44:12 | Average Match Time | 1:44:12 |
| 59% (33/56) | 1st Serve % | 79% (50/63) |
| 73% (24/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (28/50) |
| 52% (12/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 15% (2/13) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 52% (33/63) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kellovsky vs Mott Match Preview :
Examining the recent second serve performance, Mott has secured 42% of points on their second serve, whereas Kellovsky has won slightly more at 45.55%. This particular statistic often correlates closely with the accuracy of match predictions, highlighting its significance in forecasting match outcomes.
When analyzing return game statistics in recent form, Mott stands out by winning 49.56% of their opponent’s second serve points, compared to Kellovsky's 43.92%. In first serve returns, Mott maintains the upper hand with a 30.7% success rate, outperforming Kellovsky's 26.34%. This notable edge can serve as a key indicator in predicting the more favorable player in head-to-head matchups.
In evaluating performance under pressure, Mott and Kellovsky exhibit similar capacities for saving breakpoints, with Mott saving 50.22% and Kellovsky slightly ahead at 50.26%. This metric proves to be particularly insightful for those interested in in-game betting predictions.
Considering a broader performance overview from the past year, Kellovsky outperforms with a 64.71% match win rate (44/24), while Mott has achieved a win rate of 58.46% (38/27). This overarching comparison sheds light on the head-to-head prediction dynamics.
Exploring surface preferences, Mott excels on Hard courts with a 60% win rate (215/145), while struggling on Indoor Hard courts with 40% (6/9). Similarly, Kellovsky's best surface is Hard with a 58% win rate (121/86), yet they see their weakest results on Clay, achieving a win rate of 53% (144/128). These insights offer valuable context when predicting match outcomes based on surface.
Looking at the level of play over the last year, both players predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K. Mott has played with a winning proportion of 67.39% (31/15), nearly matched by Kellovsky’s 67.27% victory rate (37/18). Such figures imply a comparable level of competition and match experience.
Regarding opponent quality, Mott's recent opponents have had an average rank of 436.49, contrasting with Kellovsky's tougher competition, averaging a rank of 381.22. This context can influence perceptions of each player's statistical achievements.
Focusing on performance in deciding sets, Mott shows a 69% success rate, surpassing Kellovsky's 65%. A useful statistic for live predictions, especially if the match heads to a deciding set.
The current event-specific head-to-head statistics, if available, alongside historical performance, can offer further insights into the players' present form and highlight any event-specific advantages.
In terms of break point conversion, recent form reveals that Mott has converted 37.96% of opportunities, slightly outpacing Kellovsky's conversion rate of 36.46%. Such statistics provide valuable clues for in-game live betting strategies whenever a player faces a breakpoint chance.
In conclusion, while both players demonstrate strengths in different areas, the comparative analysis suggests Kellovsky has a slight edge, particularly with their overall win percentage and higher quality of opponents faced recently. This puts them in a favorable position to potentially secure a victory in this forthcoming contest.
Kellovsky vs Mott Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Dominik Kellovsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Gergely Madarasz
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Jan Kumstat
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Piet Luis Pinter
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Marcell Bartakovics
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
49
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
96)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
3
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
8
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Blake Mott
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Aidan Mchugh
69%
(
79 of
114)
1st Serve %
71%
(
84 of
119)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
53 of
84)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
39 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
109
|
6-1 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Blake Mott
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
59
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Fabrizio Andaloro
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Blake Mott
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Matisse Bobichon
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
73%
(
83 of
114)
1st Serve %
62%
(
88 of
141)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
12
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
88)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
62 of
141)
131
Total Points Won
124
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (294/237) | Win/Loss | 57% (255/191) |
| 54% (657/560) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (571/443) |
| 52% (6029/5572) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4974/4471) |
| 58% (123/89) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (217/148) |
| 53% (147/130) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (26/26) |
| 57% (24/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1375 | Aces Total | 927 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1318 | Total Double Faults | 1168 |
| 1:13:20 | Average Match Time | 1:13:32 |
| 448.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 535.18 |
| 62% (15603/25119) | 1st Serve % | 68% (14923/21941) |
| 69% (10718/15603) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (10191/14923) |
| 45% (4318/9515) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3386/7018) |
| 44% (1113/2551) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1045/2365) |
| 41% (10063/24735) | Return Points Win % | 41% (9167/22124) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 30% (16/37) | Challenger W/L | 51% (68/66) |
| 58% (278/200) | Futures W/L | 61% (181/114) |
| 55% (291/527) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (252/438) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (74/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (62/113) |
| 54% (85/157) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (65/128) |
| 87% (283/246) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (257/222) |
| 13% (283/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (257/34) |
| 19% (248/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (189/34) |
Kellovsky vs. Mott Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
