Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dominic Stricker vs Liam Broady Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stricker vs Broady analysis and find out who is favored!
Dominic Stricker vs Liam Broady Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stricker has won 52.12% of points on his second serve, while Broady has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stricker, in recent form, has won 47.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broady has won 51.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.96% and 30.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stricker has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broady has saved 61.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stricker has won 57.5% of matches played (W/L 23/ 17), with Broady winning 54.55% (W/L 30/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stricker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 47/ 27), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9). Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 249/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 32/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Stricker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 8/ 8), where as Broady has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Stricker winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Stricker winning 2 and Broady winning 3. The last match between Stricker and Broady was at the Lugano Challenger, 10-03-2023, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Dominic Stricker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stricker and Broady have played a deciding set 1 times, with Stricker winning 1 times and Broady 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Stricker winning 1, and Broady 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stricker has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.03 while Broady has played against players with an average rank of 286.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stricker has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broady has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stricker has converted 34.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broady has converted 43.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stricker 1 - 1 Broady
120
Rank
88
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
149
Rank
93
High
30
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
59% (103-71)
Career Total W/L
58% (470-343)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$568,045
Career Prize Money
$1,004,050
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dominic Stricker | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 16 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:25 | 1:17:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (55/116) | 60% (72/121) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (43/55) | 72% (52/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (28/61) | 65% (32/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (37/121) | 39% (45/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Dominic Stricker
Player
Liam Broady
51%
(
48 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
17
Aces
16
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-0 2-0 ret. |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Dominic Stricker
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
33%
(
7 of
21)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
35
Total Points Won
15
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dominic Stricker | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (101/93) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:34:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 207.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (373/619) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (263/373) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (121/246) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (27/66) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (249/626) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Dominic Stricker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Dominic Stricker
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
15 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
3 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
32
Total Points Won
26
|
4-3(5) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Dominic Stricker
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
4-2 3-4(3) 4-2 4-3(5) | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Luca Nardi
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
4-1 4-1 4-2 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Dominic Stricker
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
4-2 3-4(7) 4-1 4-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Dominic Stricker
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
11
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
52
Total Points Won
52
|
6-7(2) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Joao Sousa
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Dominic Stricker
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
94%
(
32 of
34)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Casper Ruud
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
122)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
53 of
78)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
24%
(
20 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Benjamin Hassan
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Dominic Stricker
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
10
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Liam Broady
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Pedro Cachin
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Aziz Dougaz
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stricker Vs Broady Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
