Prediction of Dino Prizmic [334th] vs Jakub Paul [326th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W L W W L
Form
L L W W W L L W W LHead-2-Head: Prizmic 1 - 0 Paul
They have played 2 sets in total, with Prizmic winning 2 and Paul winning 0. The last match between Prizmic and Paul was at the Lugano Challenger, 25-02-2025, First, I.hard with Dino Prizmic getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dino Prizmic | 1 |
| Jakub Paul | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Dino Prizmic
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:13:34 | Average Match Time | 1:13:34 |
| 64% (29/45) | 1st Serve % | 68% (42/62) |
| 90% (26/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (23/42) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (29/62) | Return Points Win % | 20% (9/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dino Prizmic vs Jakub Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Prizmic 1 - 0 Paul
Editorial Prediction:
How do Prizmic and Paul measure up when it comes to second serve performance? Over the past six months, Prizmic has secured 51.81% of points on their second serve, while Paul slightly edges ahead with 52.39%. This statistical data is crucial as it often correlates strongly with match predictions. Does such a small difference suggest a tightly contested match ahead?
Diving into their return game stats, Prizmic has managed to clinch 54.16% of points on their opponent's second serves recently. Conversely, Paul has captured 53.05% of these points. When looking at their first serve returns, Prizmic secures 32.07% while Paul beats this with 35.13%. What do these numbers tell us about predicting who might have the upper hand in this head-to-head showdown?
Facing pressure situations, how do these players perform? Prizmic has a breakpoint save percentage of 55.92%, while Paul improves the stakes with 65.36%. This stat becomes particularly interesting when considering in-game betting opportunities. Will this ability to fend off break points make Paul the more resilient competitor here?
Looking at the broader picture of their performance over the past year, Prizmic boasts a match-winning percentage of 52.78% (W/L 19/17), whereas Paul impresses with a 62.82% win rate (W/L 49/29). Want to know their best surface? Prizmic shines on Hard courts with an 82% win rate, while Paul has his strength on the same surface with a 65% win rate. How does this affect their predicted outcomes?
In terms of player engagement, Prizmic mostly battles it out in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K with a match-winning percentage of 54.84% (W/L 17/14). Similarly, Paul thrives in the same event category but boasts a superior 67.31% success rate (W/L 35/17). Considering this, who shows greater promise when it comes to pulling through under such tournament conditions?
Analyzing the quality of opponents, Prizmic has faced players with an average rank of 260.56, while Paul's opponents have an average rank of 377.28. This could suggest that Prizmic's better competition exposure might have honed his skills better, but does the data support this fully?
If the contest approaces a deciding set, Prizmic has clinched 64% of such circumstances over the last year, whereas Paul closes with a 53% success rate. Which player do these numbers favor should the match culminate in a nail-biting finale?
Lastly, the breakpoint conversion can often be a game-changer. Prizmic has recently converted 39.13% of his opportunities, while Paul converts at a higher rate of 45.91%. This could be pivotal for live betting, but does Paul’s ability to break serve more frequently hint at him being the likely victor?
Based on these stats and the comparative analysis, the numbers tilt favorably towards Paul as the projected winner of this match. His consistency across various metrics, particularly in handling pressure and converting breakpoints, seems to place him in the driver's seat for this intriguing encounter.
Dino Prizmic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Dino Prizmic
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
109)
4
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
6
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Federico Iannaccone
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Franco Agamenone
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
0
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Dino Prizmic
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Elias Ymer
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Dino Prizmic
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Dino Prizmic
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Vilius Gaubas
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Alexander Blockx
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Jakub Paul
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Pedro Cachin
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jakub Paul
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jakub Paul
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Alexander Blockx
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Michael Agwi
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
69%
(
82 of
118)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
56 of
82)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
120
Total Points Won
117
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Lucas Marionneau
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Jakub Paul
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (98/57) | Win/Loss | 56% (222/172) |
| 60% (210/140) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (494/395) |
| 55% (1742/1431) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4333/4002) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 451 | Aces Total | 630 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 397 | Total Double Faults | 879 |
| 1:50:4 | Average Match Time | 1:30:30 |
| 387.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 451.93 |
| 61% (6173/10123) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15740/25398) |
| 67% (4156/6173) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (10194/15740) |
| 51% (2025/3950) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4773/9668) |
| 45% (532/1191) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1262/2783) |
| 43% (4427/10208) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10647/25159) |
| 63% (94/150) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (216/388) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 32% (9/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (59/105) |
| 60% (24/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (47/99) |
| 91% (94/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (219/189) |
| 9% (94/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (219/29) |
| 20% (61/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (175/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
