Dino Prizmic vs Evgeny Karlovskiy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W L L W L
Form
W W L W W L L W L LH2H: Prizmic 1 - 1 Karlovskiy
They have played 4 sets in total, with Prizmic winning 2 and Karlovskiy winning 2. The last match between Prizmic and Karlovskiy was at the Pau Challenger, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Evgeny Karlovskiy getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dino Prizmic | 1 |
| Evgeny Karlovskiy | 1 |
Pau Challenger(17-02-2025)
6
2
6
3
| Prizmic | Stats | Karlovskiy |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (9-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (13-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 346 | Ranking | 419 |
| 155 | Highest Rank | 211 |
| 19 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 12 |
| 63% (96-56) | Career Total W/L | 56% (434-346) |
| $177,860 | Career Prize Money | $37,060 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Djokovic VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Prizmic VS Karlovskiy H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Dino Prizmic
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-0 3-0 ret. |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
41
Total Points Won
17
|
||||
Prizmic VS Karlovskiy H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:4:27 | Average Match Time | 1:4:27 |
| 56% (46/82) | 1st Serve % | 69% (57/83) |
| 63% (29/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (37/57) |
| 47% (17/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (8/26) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 46% (38/83) | Return Points Win % | 44% (36/82) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dino Prizmic vs Evgeny Karlovskiy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dino Prizmic 1 - 1 Evgeny Karlovskiy
Predictions Analysis on the Upcoming Tennis Match
- Second Serve Performance Recent Form: Recent statistics over the past six months reveal that Prizmic has achieved a 51.03% success rate on their second serve, while Karlovskiy has displayed a slightly higher proficiency with a 53.12% success rate. Notably, there exists a direct correlation between this stat and the accuracy level of match predictions.
- Return Game Stats Recent Form: Analyzing recent return game statistics, Prizmic has effectively won 53.47% of their opponents' second serve points. Comparatively, Karlovskiy has exhibited a marginally stronger performance by securing 54.07% of these points. The corresponding figures for first serve returns stand at 31.8% and 32.79% respectively. Undoubtedly, these stats significantly influence the prediction of the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Assessing the ability to handle pressure situations, Prizmic has successfully saved 58.28% of breakpoints in recent form. In contrast, Karlovskiy has demonstrated a slightly higher level of resilience by saving 60.91% of breakpoints. This statistic serves as a valuable tool for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Prizmic has emerged victorious in 52.78% of their matches (with a win-loss record of 19/17), while Karlovskiy has enjoyed an impressive 65.38% success rate (win-loss record of 51/27). These figures provide a comprehensive overview for predicting the head-to-head outcome of their upcoming encounter.
- Best Surface: When considering each player's career performance on different tennis surfaces, it is evident that Prizmic achieves their highest win percentage on Hard courts, attaining an impressive 82% success rate (win-loss record of 28/6). Conversely, their performance on Grass courts falters slightly, with a 50% win percentage (win-loss record of 1/1). In contrast, Karlovskiy excels on Hard courts, securing a 61% win percentage (win-loss record of 190/119), and struggles on Grass courts, obtaining a 33% win percentage (win-loss record of 2/4).
- Player Level: During the past year, Prizmic has primarily competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Remarkably, they have emerged victorious in 54.84% of their matches (win-loss record of 17/14). Conversely, Karlovskiy has predominantly participated in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with prize money amounting to $10,000. Astoundingly, Karlovskiy has proven triumphant in an impressive 75% of matches (win-loss record of 36/12). Consequently, when evaluating the players' stats to predict a favorite, it should be noted that their performance is relative to the level of competition they have encountered.
- Direct H2H Matches: In their previous encounters, Prizmic and Karlovskiy have competed once, with Prizmic prevailing on that occasion. Karlovskiy, unfortunately, remains without a victory against their opponent. Throughout these matches, a total of two sets have been played, both of which were won by Prizmic. The most recent meeting between the players took place at the Oeiras 2 Challenger on October 1, 2023. Prizmic emerged as the victor, securing a commanding 6-0, 3-0 (ret.) triumph.
- Head to Head Match Duration: Notably, the average match duration in their previous head-to-head contests has amounted to 0 hours, 52 minutes, and 9 seconds.
- Deciding Set H2H Prediction: Throughout their encounters, Prizmic and Karlovskiy have yet to reach a deciding set. Nonetheless, it remains a valuable statistic for predicting the potential outcome should this match extend to a third set.
- Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Remarkably, Prizmic and Karlovskiy have never faced each other in any tiebreak situations.
- Opponent Quality Stats: Over the past 12 months, Prizmic has frequently faced opponents with an average ranking of 246.42. In contrast, Karlovskiy has encountered players with an average ranking of 441.21.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: Examining their individual success rates in deciding sets, Prizmic has emerged victorious in 63% of such instances over the past year. Karlovskiy, though slightly lower, has still proven successful in winning 52% of all matches played on the tour.
- Current Event H2H Stats: While past player performances are insightful, it is also crucial to consider current event statistics when predicting tennis matches. One should redirect their attention to the section below (click here) if the players have participated in matches within the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players may demonstrate enhanced performance levels in specific tournaments, and this factor must be duly considered when making outcome predictions.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent form indicates that Prizmic has managed to convert 39.39% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Karlovskiy has successfully capitalized on 43.15% of chances to break their opponents' serve. This information proves invaluable for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player encounters a breakpoint.
- If you are interested in models that accurately predict tennis outcomes, this article provides an excellent starting point. (Warning: Suitable for statistics enthusiasts only)
Dino Prizmic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Dino Prizmic
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Elias Ymer
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Dino Prizmic
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Dino Prizmic
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Vilius Gaubas
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Alexander Blockx
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Giovanni Fonio
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Gianluca Mager
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Dino Prizmic
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Evgeny Karlovskiy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve %
44%
(
4 of
9)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
16
Total Points Won
9
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Perot
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Alexandre Reco
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Antoine Walch
56%
(
10 of
18)
1st Serve %
39%
(
7 of
18)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
20
Total Points Won
16
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Maxime Janvier
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Dino Prizmic
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (96/56) | Win/Loss | 56% (434/346) |
| 60% (205/138) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (979/799) |
| 55% (1704/1401) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8762/8088) |
| 80% (28/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (190/119) |
| 58% (37/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (95/96) |
| 59% (30/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (147/127) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 444 | Aces Total | 3051 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 376 | Total Double Faults | 1742 |
| 1:49:49 | Average Match Time | 1:12:15 |
| 380.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 531.55 |
| 61% (6028/9872) | 1st Serve % | 67% (26996/40526) |
| 67% (4057/6028) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (18949/26996) |
| 52% (1980/3844) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6438/13530) |
| 45% (518/1160) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1736/4128) |
| 43% (4332/9993) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16774/42106) |
| 50% (4/4) | Slam W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (7/6) | Main Tour W/L | 16% (4/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (50/35) | Challenger W/L | 49% (179/186) |
| 79% (34/9) | Futures W/L | 65% (247/135) |
| 63% (92/147) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (429/770) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 32% (9/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (125/249) |
| 62% (24/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (106/217) |
| 92% (91/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (424/368) |
| 8% (91/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (424/56) |
| 20% (61/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (356/66) |
See recent tennis photos of Prizmic and Karlovskiy
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
