TBD
To Win
D. Dinev
To Win
Dinko Dinev vs Maxime Chazal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W L W L
Form
L W W W L W L L L LH2H: Dinev 1 - 0 Chazal
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dinev winning 2 and Chazal winning 0. The last match between Dinev and Chazal was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 20-02-2025, Second, Clay with Dinko Dinev getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dinko Dinev | 1 |
| Maxime Chazal | 0 |
Brazzaville Challenger(20-02-2025)
6
4
6
4
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Dinev
- / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
Chazal VS TBD
- / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Linette VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Dinko Dinev
Player
Maxime Chazal
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
8
12
Aces (Total)
3
2
Total Double Faults
2
1:36:12
Average Match Time
1:36:12
73% (45/62)
1st Serve %
69% (40/58)
80% (36/45)
1st Serve Win %
78% (31/40)
47% (8/17)
2nd Serve Win %
33% (6/18)
50% (2/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/1)
36% (21/58)
Return Points Win %
29% (18/62)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dinko Dinev vs Maxime Chazal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dinko Dinev 1 - 0 Maxime Chazal
- Tiny percentage affair: In recent times (the last half year), Dinev has secured triumph in a minuscule 44.59% of points on their second serve, while Chazal has managed a slightly superior 50.38%. This statistic exhibits a remarkably strong alliance with the lucidity of match projections.
- Spellbinding return riddles: The return statistics divulge that Dinev, within recent form, has adequately ravished an awe-inspiring 54.11% of their rival's second serve points, while Chazal has captured a captivating 53.37%. As for first serve returns, the numbers stand at a magnetizing 35.72% and 34% respectively. These figures establish a lofty correlation for discerning the favored contestant in this highly anticipated head-to-head confrontation.
- Thrilling under pressure examination: Dinev's sparkling acumen has enabled them to brilliantly salvage and preserve a remarkable 60.99% of breakpoints in recent encounters; a feat not diminished by Chazal's impressive 60.34% redemption rate. Quite the consequential statistic in terms of sizzling in-game betting forecasts!
- Vivid performance panorama: Over the past year, Dinev has emerged victorious in a commendable 63.38% of contests contested (with a mighty win/loss ratio of 45/26). Meanwhile, Chazal has triumphed in a stellar 65.38% of clashes waged (boasting an impressive win/loss ratio of 51/27). These statistics bestow upon us a sweeping and comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
- Finest playing terrain: Dinev's peak supremacy shines vibrantly on the illustrious Clay court, where they strike triumph with a remarkable 64% success rate (giving birth to a sensational win/loss ratio of 61/34). However, their prowess falters on the treacherous Hard court, where they have managed a modest 52% victories (and a win/loss ratio of 17/16). When it comes to Chazal, their most exalted dominion lies in the realm of Clay courts, where they have achieved an extraordinary 64% triumph rate (with a win/loss ratio of 447/256). Alas, their performance wanes on the staggering I.hard surface, securing only a lackluster 31% victory rate (and a win/loss ratio of 8/18).
- Player stature: In the past year, Dinev has demonstrated their mettle in the prodigious realm of Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a staggering 64.71% victory rate (relishing a commendable win/loss ratio of 44/24). Conversely, Chazal has, quite magnificently, ensnared the hearts of audiences in the same domain, netting an astonishing 73.58% triumph rate (bolstering an enviable win/loss ratio of 39/14). It is important to underline that when comparing these prodigious facts between the athletes to prophesize the favored participant, one must be cognizant of the relative event level at which they have been performing.
- Foes of varying caliber: Over the last 12 months, Dinev has engaged in captivating battles against adversaries of an average ranking of 109.49, while Chazal's rallies have entailed encounters with rivals of an average rank of 407.82.
- Thrills in a decisive set: Should you find delight in live prognostications and exhilarating wagers, contemplate this: Dinev has turned the tide in a mesmerizing 47% of deciding sets during the past 12 months, while Chazal has emerged victorious in an astounding 65% of matches played on the illustrious tour.
- Present H2H event peculiarities: The study of yesteryear's player accomplishments undoubtedly harbors invaluable insight when endeavoring to anticipate the outcome of thrilling tennis contests. Nevertheless, once a frenzied event bursts into existence, it becomes imperative to examine the present tournament statistics that disclose the form of the athletes of the moment. Kindly direct your discerning gaze to the section below (in the event that the contenders have partaken in a match during the current tournament). It is vital to acknowledge that some players extract greater prowess from specialized events, and this salient fact should accordingly be factored into consideration when determining the final verdict.
- Breakpoint alchemy: Witness Dinev, whose recent form has yielded the transformation of a remarkable 44.59% of breakpoint opportunities, while Chazal has demonstrated their enchanting ability to convert an immense 46.93% of chances to ravage their opponent's serve. Most certainly, these gripping statistics hold great significance for lively in-game betting guidance whenever either player encounters a momentous breakpoint opportunity.
- In the event that you harbor a fervent interest in models that astutely foretell the trajectory of enthralling tennis competitions, it would behoove you to peruse this captivating article (Warning: Exclusively meant for audacious aficionados of statistics).
Dinko Dinev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Dinko Dinev
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Martyn Pawelski
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
12
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
49
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Dinko Dinev
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Maxime Chazal
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Paterne Mamata
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gretskiy
Player
Dinko Dinev
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mikhail Korovin
Player
Dinko Dinev
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Dinko Dinev
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Parisca
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Maxime Chazal
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Maxime Chazal
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Yassine Smiej
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Maxime Chazal
74%
(
75 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
92 of
125)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
125)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Jeremy Gschwendtner
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Anas Mazdrashki
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
108)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (81/52)
Win/Loss
60% (485/317)
59% (174/122)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (1063/764)
54% (1517/1311)
Games Win/Loss
54% (9085/7887)
51% (18/17)
Hard Win/Loss
43% (30/39)
64% (63/35)
Clay Win/Loss
63% (447/260)
0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L
31% (8/18)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.15
Aces Per Game
0.12
204
Aces Total
1008
0.17
Double Faults Per Game
0.16
239
Total Double Faults
1343
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:18:2
156.47
Average Opponent Rank
558.38
60% (3154/5260)
1st Serve %
68% (26531/39216)
65% (2036/3154)
1st Serve Win %
65% (17173/26531)
45% (943/2105)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (6183/12684)
45% (243/538)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (2051/4409)
42% (2119/5029)
Return Points Win %
43% (16405/38113)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
18% (2/9)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (4/4)
Challenger W/L
42% (62/84)
62% (77/48)
Futures W/L
65% (421/222)
60% (79/131)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
61% (479/783)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/4)
65% (11/17)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (97/188)
56% (18/32)
Deciding Set Win %
61% (144/238)
92% (76/70)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (459/404)
8% (76/6)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (459/53)
19% (57/11)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
24% (342/81)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
