Dinara Safina vs Jill Craybas Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W W W L
Form
L W L W L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Safina 6 - 0 Craybas
They have played 13 sets in total, with Safina winning 12 and Craybas winning 1. The last match between Safina and Craybas was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Fes, 19-04-2011, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Dinara Safina getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | 6 |
| Jill Craybas | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Fes(19-04-2011)
Dinara Safina
Jill Craybas
6
1
6
0
| Safina | Stats | Craybas |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 6 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 1 | Highest Rank | 39 |
| 39 | Age | 50 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 3 |
| 66% (330-167) | Career Total W/L | 46% (341-403) |
| $6,447,290 | Career Prize Money | $665,086 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kessler VS Zarazua PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
18 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cocciaretto VS Serrano PREDICTION Clay
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
18 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Dinara Safina
Player
Jill Craybas
38%
(
14 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Jill Craybas
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Jill Craybas
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Jill Craybas
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
71%
(
76 of
107)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
48 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
| 6-1 7-6(3) | |||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 12 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 81 | Games Won | 50 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 27 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
| 0:8:31 | Average Match Time | 0:8:31 |
| 59% (178/304) | 1st Serve % | 67% (198/296) |
| 72% (128/178) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (121/198) |
| 48% (60/126) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (38/98) |
| 49% (20/41) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (11/26) |
| 46% (137/296) | Return Points Win % | 38% (116/304) |
| 100% (6/6) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/6) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (5/5) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (5/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (5/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dinara Safina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Dinara Safina
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
107)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
15
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Nuria Llagostera Vives
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
49%
(
59 of
120)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
57 of
120)
115
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Anastasia Pivovarova
81%
(
74 of
91)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
45%
(
33 of
74)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
52 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Alize Cornet
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Jill Craybas
38%
(
14 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Dinara Safina
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve %
44%
(
8 of
18)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
23
Total Points Won
10
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Tsvetana Pironkova
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jill Craybas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Jill Craybas
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
3
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
52 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Jill Craybas
80%
(
75 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jill Craybas
Player
Magda Linette
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
36 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Kalashnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (330/167) | Win/Loss | 46% (341/403) |
| 63% (718/416) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (816/925) |
| 55% (5768/4717) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (7778/8209) |
| 62% (141/88) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (177/200) |
| 75% (114/39) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (85/112) |
| 65% (47/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (57/54) |
| 65% (28/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 37% (22/37) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 975 | Aces Total | 275 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1584 | Total Double Faults | 967 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 440.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 505.59 |
| 64% (13829/21645) | 1st Serve % | 64% (15048/23422) |
| 65% (8977/13830) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (8660/15048) |
| 44% (3463/7817) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3761/8375) |
| 48% (1342/2788) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1313/2862) |
| 46% (10025/21636) | Return Points Win % | 45% (10398/23139) |
| 66% (67/34) | Slam W/L | 33% (27/56) |
| 65% (100/55) | Masters W/L | 48% (61/67) |
| 0% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 68% (163/76) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (199/234) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 57% (52/40) |
| 67% (327/489) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (335/736) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (5/5) |
| 58% (67/115) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (84/155) |
| 59% (86/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (116/249) |
| 91% (309/281) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (337/277) |
| 9% (309/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (337/60) |
| 26% (187/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (407/65) |
Safina vs. Craybas Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
