Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dimitar Kutrovsky vs Jordan Cox Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kutrovsky vs Cox analysis and find out who is favored!
Dimitar Kutrovsky vs Jordan Cox Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kutrovsky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Cox has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kutrovsky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cox has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kutrovsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cox has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kutrovsky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cox winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kutrovsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 40/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 37/ 30). Cox has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 35/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kutrovsky winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kutrovsky winning 2 and Cox winning 0. The last match between Kutrovsky and Cox was at the Savannah Challenger, 02-05-2011, Q1 round, Clay with Dimitar Kutrovsky getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kutrovsky and Cox have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kutrovsky winning 0 times and Cox 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kutrovsky winning 0, and Cox 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kutrovsky has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cox has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kutrovsky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cox has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kutrovsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cox has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kutrovsky 1 - 0 Cox
Ret.
Rank
293
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
449
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
62% (222-137)
Career Total W/L
41% (61-86)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$980
Career Prize Money
$3,230
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dimitar Kutrovsky | Jordan Cox |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dimitar Kutrovsky | Jordan Cox |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Dimitar Kutrovsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Tommy Paul
Player
Dimitar Kutrovsky
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dimitar Kutrovsky
Player
Tim Smyczek
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dimitar Kutrovsky
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kutrovsky
Player
Adrien Bossel
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Dimitar Kutrovsky
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dimitar Kutrovsky
Player
Evan Song
71%
(
84 of
119)
1st Serve %
67%
(
83 of
123)
1
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
55 of
83)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
50 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
123
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(2) 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kutrovsky
Player
Ruan Roelofse
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Dimitar Kutrovsky
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dimitar Kutrovsky
Player
Andre Goransson
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Dimitar Kutrovsky
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jordan Cox Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Jordan Cox
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Kutrovsky Vs Cox Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
