D. Dedura-Palomero
To Win
K. Maamoun
To Win
Diego Dedura-Palomero vs Mackenzie Mcdonald Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W L W L
Form
L L L L L W W W L WHead To Head: Dedura-Palomero 1 - 0 Mcdonald
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dedura-Palomero winning 2 and Mcdonald winning 0. The last match between Dedura-Palomero and Mcdonald was at the BMW Open - Munich, 12-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Diego Dedura-Palomero getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Diego Dedura-Palomero | 1 |
| Mackenzie Mcdonald | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BMW Open - Munich(12-04-2025)
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Mackenzie Mcdonald
6
3
6
1
| Dedura-Palomero | Stats | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (15-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (20-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 361 | Ranking | 99 |
| 361 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 17 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 6 |
| 58% (52-37) | Career Total W/L | 56% (333-261) |
| $36,560 | Career Prize Money | $3,299,655 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
15 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Upcoming Match
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tsitsipas VS Darderi PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Diallo VS Harris PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
15 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dedura-Palomero VS Mcdonald H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Dedura-Palomero VS Mcdonald H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1:5:2 | Average Match Time | 1:5:2 |
| 73% (33/45) | 1st Serve % | 71% (32/45) |
| 76% (25/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 58% (7/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 56% (25/45) | Return Points Win % | 29% (13/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dedura-Palomero vs Mcdonald Match Preview :
Analyzing the recent form in second serve performance, Dedura-Palomero has managed to win 45.08% of points on their second serve, in contrast to Mcdonald who has achieved a closely comparable 46.42%. Such statistics are often indicative of match prediction accuracy and play a significant role in determining potential outcomes.
When evaluating return game statistics, Dedura-Palomero shows competitiveness by capturing 44.47% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Mcdonald slightly surpasses this with 45.58%. Additionally, Dedura-Palomero outdoes Mcdonald on first serve returns, securing 32.57% compared to Mcdonald's 26.17%, revealing a crucial factor in this head-to-head matchup.
The capacity to handle pressure is another critical metric, with Dedura-Palomero saving 44.15% of breakpoints under recent form conditions. Meanwhile, Mcdonald demonstrates a superior ability, saving 51.12% of breakpoints—an invaluable aspect for in-depth in-game betting predictions.
From an overarching performance perspective over the last year, Dedura-Palomero has maintained a win rate of 61.76%, with a win-loss record of 42/26. Mcdonald exhibits a slightly lower rate of 59.15%, with a record of 42/29, providing a comprehensive view of the overall head-to-head forecast.
Upon examining surface-specific performance, Dedura-Palomero’s highest win percentage is on clay courts at 63%, while the performance on indoor hard courts is weaker at 40%. Conversely, Mcdonald thrives on hard courts, achieving a 59% win ratio but struggles on clay surfaces with a 39% success rate.
Delving into the tournament levels, over the past year, Dedura-Palomero has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize pool, boasting a win rate of 69.23%. In comparison, Mcdonald has primarily engaged in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K in prize money, with a slightly higher win rate of 71.43%.
Looking at the caliber of opponents faced, Dedura-Palomero has confronted players with an average ranking of 354.47 over the previous 12 months, while Mcdonald has competed against more challenging opponents with an average rank of 196.31. This factor significantly influences the head-to-head predictive outlook.
If this matchup extends into a deciding set, it is critical to consider that Dedura-Palomero has claimed victory in 35% of such scenarios over the past year, whereas Mcdonald has exhibited a more robust performance, winning 43% of deciding sets.
Lastly, assessing breakpoint opportunities, Dedura-Palomero has successfully converted 39.77% of break points lately, surpassing Mcdonald who has converted 28.26%. This aspect becomes particularly vital for making live betting decisions when one player holds a breakpoint chance.
In summary, while Dedura-Palomero showcases strengths in certain areas such as surface performance on clay and breakpoint conversion, Mcdonald appears more adept under pressure and against a higher caliber of competition. Given these statistics, Mcdonald might possess a slight edge in clinching victory in this matchup.
Dedura-Palomero vs Mcdonald Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Diego Dedura-Palomero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Henri Squire
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
10
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alex Barrena
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Milos Karol
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Matthias Ujvary
59%
(
62 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Sydney Zick
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mackenzie Mcdonald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
55 of
75)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Mattia Bellucci
72%
(
74 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Thijs Boogaard
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Ryan Peniston
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
11
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
19 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
39
Total Points Won
50
|
4-6 0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (52/37) | Win/Loss | 56% (333/261) |
| 58% (114/83) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (801/644) |
| 54% (989/855) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7180/6639) |
| 50% (5/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (215/151) |
| 61% (45/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 37% (23/39) |
| 40% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (56/41) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (39/30) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 72 | Aces Total | 2410 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 155 | Total Double Faults | 1343 |
| 1:32:25 | Average Match Time | 1:33:14 |
| 150.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 404.33 |
| 71% (4044/5666) | 1st Serve % | 63% (25651/40502) |
| 62% (2510/4044) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17888/25651) |
| 51% (829/1622) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7617/14851) |
| 48% (283/595) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1626/3851) |
| 43% (2388/5612) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16011/41199) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (32/32) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 48% (41/44) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 80% (4/1) |
| 40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (81/87) |
| 39% (7/11) | Challenger W/L | 63% (134/78) |
| 66% (43/22) | Futures W/L | 68% (41/19) |
| 57% (49/86) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (309/542) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (21/48) |
| 62% (16/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (97/194) |
| 40% (8/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (83/180) |
| 92% (48/44) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (347/280) |
| 8% (48/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (347/67) |
| 17% (41/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (247/53) |
Dedura-Palomero vs. Mcdonald Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
