Diego Dedura-Palomero vs Daniel Verbeek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W W L L L
Form
L L L L W L W W L LHead-to-head: Dedura-Palomero 1 - 0 Verbeek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dedura-Palomero winning 2 and Verbeek winning 0. The last match between Dedura-Palomero and Verbeek was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 18-02-2025, First, Hard with Diego Dedura-Palomero getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(18-02-2025)
6
2
6
2
46% (6-7)
YTD Win/Loss
43% (3-4)
1
Head-to-Head
0
556
Ranking
N/A
556
Highest Rank
17
Age
20
-
Plays
-
0
Titles
0
61% (43-28)
Career Total W/L
56% (35-27)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
1
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Dedura-Palomero VS Verbeek H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Daniel Verbeek
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Dedura-Palomero VS Verbeek H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
4
0
Aces (Total)
0
1
Total Double Faults
1
1:11:52
Average Match Time
1:11:52
59% (26/44)
1st Serve %
59% (24/41)
69% (18/26)
1st Serve Win %
46% (11/24)
56% (10/18)
2nd Serve Win %
29% (5/17)
67% (6/9)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (2/5)
61% (25/41)
Return Points Win %
36% (16/44)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Diego Dedura-Palomero vs Daniel Verbeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Diego Dedura-Palomero 1 - 0 Daniel Verbeek
- Analyzing Second Serve Performance: Taking into account the recent form of Dedura-Palomero and Verbeek over the past six months, it is notable that Dedura-Palomero has triumphed in 52.12% of points on their second serve, whereas Verbeek boasts a slightly higher success rate of 54.39%. It is worth mentioning the strong correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Examining Return Game Statistics: When observing the return stats of both players in their recent form, Dedura-Palomero emerges as the victor in 51.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Verbeek is not far behind with a success rate of 51.7%. A closer analysis reveals that in terms of first serve returns, Dedura-Palomero boasts a percentage of 39.02%, whereas Verbeek stands at 32.39%. These figures play a significant role in determining the favored contender in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: In terms of dealing with critical moments, Dedura-Palomero has shown resilience by saving 55.93% of breakpoints in recent times. In contrast, Verbeek has managed to save only 46.25% of such situations. A noteworthy statistic that holds relevance in predicting in-game betting scenarios.
- Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Dedura-Palomero has prevailed in 65% of the matches they participated in (with a win-loss record of 39/21), while Verbeek boasts a slightly lower success rate of 60.78% (with a win-loss record of 31/20). These statistics provide an overall prediction overview for their head-to-head encounters.
- Assessing the Best Surface: When considering their performance on different surfaces, Dedura-Palomero showcases their utmost proficiency on clay courts with a success rate of 65% (W/L 36/19). Conversely, their weakest performance lies on indoor hard courts, where they manage a success rate of 40% (W/L 2/3). As for Verbeek, the hard court surface serves as their stronghold with a win percentage of 61% (W/L 17/11), while they encounter more challenges on clay courts, winning 56% of matches (W/L 18/14).
- Player Level: In the past year, Dedura-Palomero predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a maximum prize pool of $10K, securing victory in an impressive 70.83% of matches (W/L 34/14). On the other hand, Verbeek has also predominantly participated in similar tournaments, winning 60.78% of matches (W/L 31/20). When comparing these statistics to predict the favored player, it is crucial to consider the level of the respective events they have been involved in.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: During the last 12 months, Dedura-Palomero has faced opponents with an average ranking of 368.3. In contrast, Verbeek has encountered players with an average ranking of 153.9. This disparity in the quality of opponents must be taken into account when predicting the outcome of their matches.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, it is relevant to note that Dedura-Palomero has achieved victory in 33% of deciding sets over the past 12 months, whereas Verbeek has succeeded in 50% of such instances throughout their tour matches.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance serves as a valuable tool in predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to also delve into current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the section below for an insight into their performances during the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players may excel more in specific events, which should be considered when making predictions.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent competitions, Dedura-Palomero has capitalized on 48.72% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Verbeek has managed to convert 45.78% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic bears significance when seeking in-game live betting tips, especially during moments of breakpoint opportunities for either player.
- If you desire models that offer predictions for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point for your exploration (Warning: Suitable for stats enthusiasts only).
Diego Dedura-Palomero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
60 of
77)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Nicola Kuhn
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Daniel Verbeek
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Michael Gloeckler
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florian Broska
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Verbeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 2-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Daniel Verbeek
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Verbeek
Player
Lewie Lane
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Daniel Verbeek
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Daniel Verbeek
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dimitris Sakellaridis
Player
Daniel Verbeek
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (43/28)
Win/Loss
56% (35/27)
61% (95/62)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (78/60)
55% (810/666)
Games Win/Loss
54% (710/614)
50% (5/5)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (17/13)
64% (36/20)
Clay Win/Loss
56% (18/14)
40% (2/3)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.08
Aces Per Game
0.04
61
Aces Total
24
0.17
Double Faults Per Game
0.12
120
Total Double Faults
78
1:33:36
Average Match Time
1st Match
375.52
Average Opponent Rank
147.9
72% (3295/4555)
1st Serve %
64% (1131/1777)
62% (2053/3295)
1st Serve Win %
60% (678/1131)
52% (654/1260)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (312/646)
47% (232/496)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (80/178)
43% (1937/4501)
Return Points Win %
40% (684/1707)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
38% (5/8)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
66% (38/20)
Futures W/L
56% (35/27)
59% (40/68)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (35/62)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
59% (13/22)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
63% (5/8)
31% (5/16)
Deciding Set Win %
43% (6/14)
93% (40/37)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (37/32)
8% (40/3)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (37/5)
16% (31/5)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
12% (25/3)
See recent tennis photos of Dedura-Palomero and Verbeek
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
