J. M. Cerundolo
To Win
D. E. Galan
To Win
Diego Dedura-Palomero vs Daniel Elahi Galan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L L W L L
Form
W L W L W L L L W WHead-To-Head: Dedura-Palomero 0 - 1 Galan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Dedura-Palomero winning 1 and Galan winning 2. The last match between Dedura-Palomero and Galan was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 21-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Daniel Elahi Galan getting the victory 6-7(7) 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Diego Dedura-Palomero | 0 |
| Daniel Elahi Galan | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(21-04-2025)
Daniel Elahi Galan
Diego Dedura-Palomero
6
7
6
4
6
1
| Dedura-Palomero | Stats | Galan |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (10-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (24-14) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 372 | Ranking | 118 |
| 372 | Highest Rank | 56 |
| 17 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 10 |
| 57% (47-35) | Career Total W/L | 55% (411-332) |
| $36,560 | Career Prize Money | $1,547,665 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kasatkina VS Siniakova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dolehide VS Minnen PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dedura-Palomero VS Galan H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
101)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Dedura-Palomero VS Galan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 18 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:28:13 | Average Match Time | 2:28:13 |
| 75% (76/101) | 1st Serve % | 75% (75/100) |
| 54% (41/76) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (54/75) |
| 72% (18/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 20% (1/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 34% (34/100) | Return Points Win % | 42% (42/101) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dedura-Palomero vs Galan Match Preview :
Ah, the grand duel on the tennis court is nigh, and what an epic tale of rackets and serves we have in our hands! Let's dive into these stats that are more enlightening than a coaching session with Yoda. In the past six months, our hero Galan has been lovingly caressing the second serve points like a delicate souffle, winning a scrumptious 44.86%. Meanwhile, Dedura-Palomero isn't exactly a second serve slouch, edging out with a marginally tastier 44.89%. It's so close you could slice it with a tennis string! History tells us such numbers are a crystal ball for peeking into match outcomes.
When we bring the return game into our cinematic adventure, Galan's recent form shines brighter with a thumping 45.81% win rate on opponents' second serve, compared to Dedura-Palomero's valiant attempt at 43.41%. Of course, Dedura-Palomero seems to have a sneaky little talent for first serve returns, scooping up 32.02% of the points while Galan diligently pockets 25.39%. Once we thread these stats together, they mischievously start telling us who's on top of this H2H battle.
As if that weren't enough to chew on, under pressure, Galan stands resilient, much like a philosopher in serene contemplation, saving 56.29% of breakpoints thrown at him. Alas, our darling Dedura-Palomero, with sweat and swagger, manages a not-so-far behind 42.97%. But, worry not, good folks, there's more angle to dissect! Over this tantalizing tennis year, Galan has triumphed in 57.14% of matches (W/L 44/33), slightly trailing behind Dedura-Palomero's glamorous 61.11% (W/L 44/28) victory parade. Such jaw-dropping numbers guide our humble predictions.
If we were to footnote this odyssey with a tale of surfaces, clay courts are where both protagonists excel. Galan's fiery clay prowess shines with a 59% win rate, a decent feat yet not quite as dazzling as Dedura-Palomero's 62%. It's as though they both enjoy sliding around in the dirt like happy toddlers! Alas, their skills on I.hard courts reveal Dedura-Palomero's 40% proficiency is the cleaner squeak over Galan's less enthusiastic 15%.
Venturing into the realm of tournaments, Galan, the dashing hero, can often be found jousting at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, capturing 62.75% of his victories. Meanwhile, Dedura-Palomero claims dominion over the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K realm, boasting an impressive conquest rate of 69.23%. Much like choosing between equally irresistible desserts, one must consider the event level to crown the favorite.
Facing adversaries of significant caliber has been Galan’s domain, with his foes holding an average rank of 204.35, while Dedura-Palomero roams battles of somewhat lesser-weighted opponents with an average rank of 337.53. Should this saga unfold into the climactic deciding set, Galan emerges from the conundrum 55% of the time, leaving Dedura-Palomero a 35% chance to settle the score.
Finally, we reflect upon breakpoint conversion where Dedura-Palomero has certainly proven his knack by converting 39.38% of his offerings, while Galan has made the weaker conversion of 28.49%. As these stats paint a frothy picture of calculation and a volley of banter, when the curtain rises on this tennis court theater, Dedura-Palomero, given the Factaminator's relentless scrutiny, might just be the more favored victor in this suspense-filled tennis match.
Dedura-Palomero vs Galan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Diego Dedura-Palomero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filippo Speziali
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Manuel Mazza
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
101)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Denis Shapovalov
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
40
|
7-6(2) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Elahi Galan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Dmitry Popko
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Omar Jasika
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
70%
(
75 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
15
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
42 of
51)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
30%
(
32 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
24 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Billy Harris
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
35%
(
18 of
51)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
89)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
101)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (47/35) | Win/Loss | 55% (411/332) |
| 57% (104/78) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (961/813) |
| 53% (908/792) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8825/8257) |
| 50% (5/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (106/99) |
| 60% (40/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (291/206) |
| 40% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 15% (3/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 67 | Aces Total | 3219 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 137 | Total Double Faults | 1200 |
| 1:33:34 | Average Match Time | 1:31:13 |
| 364.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 421.36 |
| 72% (3792/5268) | 1st Serve % | 62% (30092/48394) |
| 62% (2345/3792) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (20976/30092) |
| 51% (756/1476) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9300/18300) |
| 47% (261/554) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1821/4395) |
| 43% (2215/5201) | Return Points Win % | 39% (18493/47766) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 56% (34/27) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 31% (9/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 64% (9/5) |
| 40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (57/65) |
| 38% (6/10) | Challenger W/L | 56% (217/170) |
| 65% (39/21) | Futures W/L | 66% (84/44) |
| 56% (44/79) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (393/708) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 60% (15/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (141/256) |
| 37% (7/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (124/248) |
| 91% (43/39) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (419/351) |
| 9% (43/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (419/68) |
| 18% (39/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (324/60) |
Dedura-Palomero vs. Galan Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
