Diana Martynov vs Alina Charaeva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
L W W W W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Martynov 1 - 0 Charaeva
They have played 3 sets in total, with Martynov winning 2 and Charaeva winning 1. The last match between Martynov and Charaeva was at the Open 35 de Saint-Malo - Saint-Malo, 27-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Diana Martynov getting the victory 7-5 2-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Diana Martynov | 1 |
| Alina Charaeva | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Open 35 de Saint-Malo - Saint-Malo(27-04-2025)
Diana Martynov
Alina Charaeva
7
5
2
6
6
4
| Martynov | Stats | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (13-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (21-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 391 | Ranking | 184 |
| 339 | Highest Rank | 184 |
| 24 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 8 |
| 53% (174-157) | Career Total W/L | 65% (171-93) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $5,000 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Muller VS Safiullin PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boyer VS Pavlovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Diana Martynov
Player
Alina Charaeva
79%
(
89 of
112)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
53%
(
59 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 15 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:57:8 | Average Match Time | 2:57:8 |
| 79% (89/112) | 1st Serve % | 53% (54/102) |
| 51% (45/89) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (29/54) |
| 35% (8/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (18/48) |
| 53% (9/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (9/17) |
| 54% (55/102) | Return Points Win % | 53% (59/112) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martynov vs Charaeva Match Preview :
Charaeva has demonstrated her abilities in recent months by securing 35.74% of points on her second serve, while Martynov is slightly behind with 35.28%. This statistic is crucial as it significantly influences match predictions. When considering return game statistics, Charaeva has effectively won 50% of her opponent's second serve points recently, whereas Martynov exceeds this with 53.19%.
The performance on first serve returns offers more insight into their capabilities—Charaeva standing at 36.53% and Martynov slightly lower at 36.02%. Charaeva's breakpoint-saving ability stands at 47.52% compared to Martynov's 44.44%, indicating her stronger resilience under pressure, which is advantageous for in-game betting.
Over the past year, Charaeva has achieved a match win rate of 58.57% (W/L 41/29), displaying a consistent performance compared to Martynov’s 50.94% (W/L 27/26). Both have shown their best career surface win percentages on Hard courts, with Charaeva leading at 67% and Martynov at 55%. On indoor hard courts, Charaeva has a win rate of 59%, surpassing Martynov’s 48%.
Analyzing their match history, Charaeva has faced opponents with an average rank of 359.49, which is slightly higher than Martynov’s average opponent rank of 361.72. In deciding sets, Charaeva shows an edge with a 57% win rate compared to Martynov's 55% over the past 12 months, highlighting her potential in close matches.
Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments valued over $10K, with Charaeva winning 58.57% of her matches in this category, and Martynov closely following with 51.92%. This stat reflects their level of play and experience within similar competitive environments.
In terms of breakpoint conversion rates, Charaeva successfully converts 39.64% of her opportunities, while Martynov converts a higher 43.27%. This becomes pivotal during critical moments in the match. Considering all the statistical elements and recent performances, Charaeva appears to be the stronger contender, positioning her as the likely victor in the upcoming match.
Martynov vs Charaeva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Diana Martynov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mathilde Lollia
Player
Diana Martynov
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
60 of
75)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Maryna Kolb
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
40
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Diana Martynov
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
90%
(
61 of
68)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Julie Bousseau
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Bertoldo
Player
Diana Martynov
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
88%
(
88 of
100)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
45 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Sijia Wei
79%
(
108 of
136)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
49%
(
66 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
121
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(1) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
59 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Eleejah Inisan
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
49
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Alina Charaeva
44%
(
32 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Alicia Herrero Linana
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Maria Kozyreva
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Teodora Kostovic
71%
(
72 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
85%
(
82 of
97)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Lia Karatancheva
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (174/157) | Win/Loss | 65% (171/93) |
| 52% (394/362) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (364/227) |
| 51% (3640/3440) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2963/2404) |
| 55% (53/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (71/35) |
| 54% (78/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (70/37) |
| 48% (43/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (30/21) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 333 | Aces Total | 436 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.46 |
| 965 | Total Double Faults | 1209 |
| 1:22:30 | Average Match Time | 1:42:40 |
| 417.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 433.9 |
| 69% (12384/17898) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10105/16513) |
| 58% (7194/12384) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6295/10105) |
| 42% (2309/5514) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2740/6408) |
| 49% (1073/2194) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1194/2357) |
| 46% (8000/17244) | Return Points Win % | 49% (8263/16857) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 48% (85/92) | Challenger W/L | 63% (135/78) |
| 58% (89/64) | Futures W/L | 71% (35/14) |
| 52% (171/328) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (163/254) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (25/49) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (27/55) |
| 49% (48/97) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (41/71) |
| 84% (176/148) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (163/147) |
| 16% (176/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (163/15) |
| 17% (155/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (101/23) |
Martynov vs. Charaeva Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
