Prediction of Diana Marcinkevica vs Naho Sato Head-to-Head, At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
1 - 0
51% (523-493)
Career Total W/L
60% (171-116)
25% (1-3)
Win/Loss
44% (4-5)
$31,119
Career Prize Money
$2,140
0
YTD Titles
0
Marcinkevica VS Sato H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Naho Sato
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Marcinkevica VS Sato H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Diana Marcinkevica | Naho Sato |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 1:46:0 | 1:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (37/62) | 72% (55/76) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (26/37) | 51% (28/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) | 52% (11/21) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points Win % | 49% (37/76) | 39% (24/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Diana Marcinkevica Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alevtina Ibragimova
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Ishwari Matere
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Vaishnavi Adkar
57%
(
62 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
7
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Zeel Desai
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
0
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
10
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
45 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Naho Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Naho Sato
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Pranjala Yadlapalli
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Naho Sato
48%
(
44 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
46 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Ariana Geerlings
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
12
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
53 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Naho Sato
53%
(
61 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
55 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Alice Robbe
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariia Tkacheva
Player
Naho Sato
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Naho Sato
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Diana Marcinkevica | Naho Sato |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 51% (523/493) | 60% (171/116) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (1209/1151) | 58% (370/272) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (11020/10696) | 54% (3090/2649) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (174/145) | 59% (125/88) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (191/217) | 69% (35/16) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (156/129) | 50% (11/11) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.17 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 1780 | 106 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| Total Double Faults | 2823 | 793 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:30:37 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 215.55 | 310.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (23498/41848) | 66% (11123/16756) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 64% (15052/23498) | 59% (6606/11123) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (7859/18351) | 46% (2587/5633) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2338/5072) | 52% (1171/2232) |
| Return Points Win % | 45% (18893/42069) | 48% (8162/16888) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 22% (5/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 31% (10/22) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (386/379) | 53% (112/101) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (122/69) | 81% (58/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (518/1007) | 59% (167/283) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (113/229) | 60% (26/43) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (170/337) | 56% (40/72) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (511/430) | 90% (163/147) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (511/81) | 10% (163/16) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (505/94) | 19% (124/24) |
See recent tennis photos of Marcinkevica and Sato
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
