Prediction of Despina Papamichail [249th] vs Eva Vedder [264th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L W L
Form
W W L L W L W L W LHead To Head: Papamichail 0 - 0 Vedder
| Papamichail | Stats | Vedder |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (19-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (13-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 249 | Ranking | 264 |
| 143 | Highest Rank | 221 |
| 32 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 15 | Titles | 3 |
| 56% (554-434) | Career Total W/L | 58% (234-169) |
| $269,679 | Career Prize Money | $9,620 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Papamichail VS Vedder H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Despina Papamichail vs Eva Vedder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Papamichail 0 - 0 Vedder
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papamichail has won 39.93% of points on their second serve, while Vedder has won 43.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papamichail, in recent form, has won 50.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vedder has won 48.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.23% and 30.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papamichail has saved 49.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vedder has saved 48.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papamichail has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 40/ 32), with Vedder winning 60% (W/L 45/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papamichail has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 209/ 143), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 28% (W/L 11/ 28). Vedder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 80/ 56), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Papamichail has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.92% of matches (W/L 37/ 28), where as Vedder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.32% of matches (W/L 38/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papamichail has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.81 while Vedder has played against players with an average rank of 284.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papamichail has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vedder has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papamichail has converted 39.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vedder has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Despina Papamichail vs Eva Vedder Best Odds For The Match
Despina Papamichail Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Despina Papamichail
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Sofia Rocchetti
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Stephanie Wagner
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve %
40%
(
4 of
10)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
18
Total Points Won
8
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Martha Matoula
73%
(
77 of
106)
1st Serve %
72%
(
81 of
113)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
53 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Verena Meliss
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
78%
(
7 of
9)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
10
Total Points Won
5
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Despina Papamichail
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
79%
(
67 of
85)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Despina Papamichail
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
98)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
54 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(1) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Eva Vedder
81%
(
68 of
84)
1st Serve %
95%
(
53 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Jule Niemeier
102%
(
61 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julieta Pareja
Player
Eva Vedder
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
41%
(
46 of
111)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Eva Vedder
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Eva Vedder
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Anouk Koevermans
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Thaisa Grana Pedretti
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Papamichail vs Vedder?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Papamichail Vs Vedder is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (554/434) | Win/Loss | 58% (234/169) |
| 55% (1244/1035) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (527/393) |
| 52% (10770/9818) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4527/3959) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 454 | Aces Total | 988 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1218 | Total Double Faults | 980 |
| 1:4:17 | Average Match Time | 1:30:52 |
| 212.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 297.87 |
| 68% (27494/40664) | 1st Serve % | 58% (13669/23496) |
| 58% (15835/27494) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (8729/13636) |
| 46% (6055/13170) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4793/9882) |
| 49% (2686/5429) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1397/2921) |
| 48% (19288/40438) | Return Points Win % | 46% (10969/24047) |
| 56% (544/975) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (230/398) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (101/197) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (42/89) |
| 54% (168/310) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (55/118) |
| 85% (536/458) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (247/206) |
| 15% (536/78) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (247/40) |
| 21% (452/95) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (156/27) |
See recent tennis photos of Papamichail and Vedder
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
