Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dennis Novak vs Thomas Fabbiano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Novak vs Fabbiano analysis and find out who is favored!
Dennis Novak vs Thomas Fabbiano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Novak has won 47.25% of points on his second serve, while Fabbiano has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Novak, in recent form, has won 51.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fabbiano has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.02% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Novak has saved 61.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fabbiano has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Novak has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 36/ 28), with Fabbiano winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Novak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 115/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 77/ 63). Fabbiano has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 219/ 136), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 45/ 57).
- Player level: In the last year, Novak has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.77% of matches (W/L 29/ 23), where as Fabbiano has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Novak winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Novak winning 4 and Fabbiano winning 1. The last match between Novak and Fabbiano was at the Erste Bank Open - Vienna, 22-10-2017, Q3, I.hard with Dennis Novak getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Novak and Fabbiano have played a deciding set 1 times, with Novak winning 1 times and Fabbiano 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Novak winning 1, and Fabbiano 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Novak has played against opponents with an average rank of 316.41 while Fabbiano has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Novak has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fabbiano has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Novak has converted 41.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fabbiano has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Novak 2 - 0 Fabbiano
217
Rank
85
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
673
Rank
70
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
63% (484-288)
Career Total W/L
55% (521-428)
50% (9-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$797,895
Career Prize Money
$1,279,588
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dennis Novak | Thomas Fabbiano |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:3 | 1:53:3 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (104/177) | 60% (94/157) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (74/104) | 67% (63/94) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (38/73) | 52% (33/63) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 29% (5/17) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (61/157) | 37% (65/177) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Dennis Novak
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 7-5 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dennis Novak | Thomas Fabbiano |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (20/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (181/173) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 49 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 358.39 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (753/1100) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (508/753) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (170/347) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (50/122) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (439/1108) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Dennis Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Dennis Novak
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
78%
(
69 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Noah Regas Luis
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Dennis Novak
78%
(
83 of
106)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
32 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Dennis Novak
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jules Marie
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Alexis Galarneau
79%
(
71 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Thomas Fabbiano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
47%
(
46 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Michael Agwi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
18
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Alastair Gray
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
2
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
48 of
59)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
47 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
8
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
29 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Novak Vs Fabbiano Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
