Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dennis Novak vs Paul Jubb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Novak vs Jubb analysis and find out who is favored!
Dennis Novak vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Novak has won 48.11% of points on his second serve, while Jubb has won 53.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Novak, in recent form, has won 50.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 51.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.66% and 35.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Novak has saved 60.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 61.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Novak has won 55.38% of matches played (W/L 36/ 29), with Jubb winning 67.74% (W/L 42/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Novak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 115/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 77/ 63). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Novak has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.72% of matches (W/L 29/ 24), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Novak winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Novak winning 4 and Jubb winning 0. The last match between Novak and Jubb was at the Ilkley Challenger, 20-06-2019, Third, Grass with Dennis Novak getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Novak and Jubb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Novak winning 0 times and Jubb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Novak winning 0, and Jubb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Novak has played against opponents with an average rank of 319.97 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 292.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Novak has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Novak has converted 41.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 44.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Novak 2 - 0 Jubb
217
Rank
85
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
2
Grass0
385
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
63% (484-289)
Career Total W/L
69% (189-83)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
66% (19-10)
$797,895
Career Prize Money
$54,540
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dennis Novak | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:7 | 1:7:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (74/113) | 61% (77/127) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (58/74) | 65% (50/77) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (23/39) | 44% (22/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (55/127) | 28% (32/113) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Dennis Novak
Player
Paul Jubb
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Paul Jubb
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dennis Novak | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 66% (19/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (21/21) | 63% (45/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (196/187) | 55% (388/317) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 71% (10/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 69% (9/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 125 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 88 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:17 | 1:52:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 368.37 | 275.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (800/1183) | 61% (1325/2158) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (545/800) | 72% (957/1325) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (192/383) | 55% (457/833) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (52/125) | 41% (96/234) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (467/1199) | 41% (955/2325) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (9/10) | 66% (19/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (9/18) | 66% (19/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 36% (11/4) |
Dennis Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Dennis Novak
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Dennis Novak
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
78%
(
69 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Noah Regas Luis
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Dennis Novak
78%
(
83 of
106)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
32 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Dennis Novak
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jules Marie
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yunseong Chung
Player
Paul Jubb
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Egor Gerasimov
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Andrew Fenty
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Jea Moon Lee
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
47 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Novak Vs Jubb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
