Denislav Prodanov vs Matteo DE Vincentis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Prodanov vs Vincentis analysis and find out who is favored!
Denislav Prodanov vs Matteo DE Vincentis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Prodanov has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Vincentis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Prodanov, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vincentis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Prodanov has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vincentis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Prodanov has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Vincentis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Prodanov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Vincentis has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Prodanov has played against opponents with an average rank of while Vincentis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Prodanov has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vincentis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Prodanov has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vincentis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Prodanov 0 - 0 Vincentis
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Denislav Prodanov | Matteo DE Vincentis |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Denislav Prodanov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Timo Legout
Player
Denislav Prodanov
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 5-7 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Shalva Dzhanashia
Player
Denislav Prodanov
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 2-6 7-6(13) | H2H |
view more
Matteo DE Vincentis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Marco Furlanetto
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Stefan Palosi
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Antonio Caruso
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more