Denis Kudla vs Carl Emil Overbeck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L W L L L
Form
W W W W W W W L L LHead-to-head: Kudla 1 - 0 Overbeck
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kudla winning 2 and Overbeck winning 1. The last match between Kudla and Overbeck was at the Tiburon Challenger, 30-09-2024, First, Hard with Denis Kudla getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4.
Tiburon Challenger(30-09-2024)
7
6
6
7
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sherif VS Sun PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Denis Kudla
Player
Carl Emil Overbeck
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
10
Aces
20
8
Double Faults
6
84%
(
54 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
33 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
33 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
19
Games Won
17
10
Aces (Total)
20
8
Total Double Faults
6
2:13:14
Average Match Time
2:13:14
58% (64/110)
1st Serve %
62% (69/111)
84% (54/64)
1st Serve Win %
78% (54/69)
50% (23/46)
2nd Serve Win %
57% (24/42)
50% (2/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
10% (1/10)
30% (33/111)
Return Points Win %
30% (33/110)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Denis Kudla Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Denis Kudla
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
11 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Denis Kudla
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
6
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
35%
(
17 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
100
|
0-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Denis Kudla
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Bor Artnak
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Denis Kudla
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
34 of
40)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Carl Emil Overbeck
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
10
Aces
20
8
Double Faults
6
84%
(
54 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
33 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
33 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Denis Kudla
48%
(
56 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
8
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
6
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
43%
(
26 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
47 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
112
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Denis Kudla
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Micah Braswell
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Carl Emil Overbeck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Carl Emil Overbeck
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Carl Emil Overbeck
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
10
Aces
20
8
Double Faults
6
84%
(
54 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
33 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
33 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Carl Emil Overbeck
58%
(
68 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
51 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carl Emil Overbeck
Player
Branko Djuric
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carl Emil Overbeck
Player
Nicolas Ifi
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carl Emil Overbeck
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carl Emil Overbeck
Player
Kane Bonsach Ganley
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carl Emil Overbeck
Player
Jacques-Kai Inoue
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
56% (504/400)
Win/Loss
62% (23/14)
53% (1178/1036)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (49/35)
51% (10934/10402)
Games Win/Loss
54% (424/354)
55% (237/196)
Hard Win/Loss
50% (3/3)
49% (76/80)
Clay Win/Loss
65% (20/11)
61% (105/67)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/0)
60% (86/57)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.39
Aces Per Game
0.17
4103
Aces Total
66
0.24
Double Faults Per Game
0.26
2457
Total Double Faults
98
1:27:35
Average Match Time
1st Match
510.43
Average Opponent Rank
250.7
59% (35830/61010)
1st Serve %
63% (968/1545)
70% (25204/35830)
1st Serve Win %
66% (639/968)
51% (12872/25177)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (251/577)
42% (2427/5848)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (75/169)
39% (23885/61771)
Return Points Win %
43% (630/1480)
55% (62/51)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
41% (29/42)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
100% (1/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
49% (113/119)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
62% (265/164)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/2)
60% (34/23)
Futures W/L
66% (23/12)
57% (477/841)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
62% (23/37)
41% (24/58)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
48% (150/313)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
20% (1/5)
57% (185/322)
Deciding Set Win %
70% (7/10)
83% (482/402)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (19/19)
16% (482/79)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (19/0)
24% (422/100)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (18/4)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
