Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Deni Zmak vs Filip Setic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zmak vs Setic analysis and find out who is favored!
Deni Zmak vs Filip Setic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zmak has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Setic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zmak, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Setic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zmak has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Setic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zmak has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Setic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zmak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 48/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Setic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zmak has played against opponents with an average rank of while Setic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zmak has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Setic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zmak has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Setic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zmak 0 - 0 Setic
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
35
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
54% (50-42)
Career Total W/L
27% (3-8)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Deni Zmak | Filip Setic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deni Zmak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alen Rogic Hadzalic
Player
Deni Zmak
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deni Zmak
Player
Matej Galik
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Deni Zmak
Player
Pasquale De Giorgio
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Deni Zmak
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Deni Zmak
Player
Alen Rogic Hadzalic
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Deni Zmak
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
115)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deni Zmak
Player
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(3) 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Setic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Zmak Vs Setic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
