D. Back
To Win
X. You
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W W L W WForm
W L L L W L L L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Back winning 2 and Buchnik winning 0. The last match between Back and Buchnik was at the W35 Nonthaburi, 11-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Dayeon Back getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Dayeon Back | 1 |
Mika Buchnik | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Nonthaburi(11-03-2025)
Back | Stats | Buchnik |
---|---|---|
65% (20-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (2-6) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
314 | Ranking | 878 |
295 | Highest Rank | 843 |
23 | Age | 18 |
- | Plays | - |
7 | Titles | 0 |
69% (171-78) | Career Total W/L | 53% (23-20) |
$4,220 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
- / Quarterfinals
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Dayeon Back
Player
Mika Buchnik
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 1 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:6:18 | Average Match Time | 1:6:18 |
69% (31/45) | 1st Serve % | 47% (18/38) |
65% (20/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 22% (4/18) |
50% (7/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (4/20) |
64% (7/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 14% (1/7) |
79% (30/38) | Return Points Win % | 40% (18/45) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the latest form analysis, Back's second serve has been about as reliable as a cat walking next to a vase, securing just 37.08% of points. In a close race to hilarity, Buchnik isn’t far behind, with a success rate of 36.73%. With such razor-thin margins, predicting the winner is like picking the last jelly bean out from a jar without cheating by peeking.
Now, onto the return game stats, where Back has been the Venus flytrap of the tennis world, winning 52.63% of their opponent's second serve points. Buchnik's performance, while not reaching Venus flytrap levels, is respectable, converting 51.35% of first serves into joyous returns. In the mystery of tennis equations, Back manages to return 34.39% of first serves, while Buchnik returns at 32.89%—a differential that surely validates the prophecies whispered at courts late at night.
Let’s share a chuckle at the breakpoint escapade. Saving a formidable 45.26% of their breakpoints, Back shows their skills—perhaps wearing an invisibility cloak when opponents least expect it. Buchnik, slightly better at saving 48.1%, seems to have a magic wand ready for every crucial point. In case it boils down to performing under pressure, the betting world might want to take notice of this particular potion.
Zooming out for a broader performance overview: Back is dashing across the courts with a win rate of 72.22% in the past year. Buchnik is trudging behind with a reasonable 56.25%, which provides food for thought—possibly at the next Grand Slam picnic. If the racquet’s strings could talk, they'd likely weave complex tales about Back’s dominance on Hard courts, boasting a 70% win record, compared to an ironic 50% on Indoor Hard courts. Meanwhile, Buchnik finds their groove in the mud and clay, with a 67% winning rate there, despite a comparatively humble 56% on Hard surfaces.
Then there’s the quality of opponents, with Back tangling with adversaries averaging a rank of 243.67 - almost suggesting they’re training with sparrows. Buchnik, however, has been grappling with opponents averaging rank 123.44, navigating through a maze of top 100 predators. As any tennis enthusiast knows, this quality parameter arguably puts historical tactics into perspective.
Let’s not forget crunch time: in those teeth-clattering deciding sets, Back has majestically won 63% of them over the last 12 months, compared to Buchnik's 33%. If epic battles like the Arthurian legends lure you, consider how these numbers could channel the power of Excalibur and cut sharply into your predictions.
As we conjure up possible outcomes, in the realm of breakpoint conversion, Back turns magic beans into castle-jumping opportunities 42.75% of the time. Adding a touch more to the cauldron, Buchnik conjures success in 43.18% of those moments. Nonetheless, with all the stats lined up under the shining stars, it looks like Back might slightly edge out the victory with their overall robust performance—though both donning their elf shoes of unexpected surprises!
Back vs Buchnik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dayeon Back
Player
Sunam Jeong
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
83%
(
45 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Janice Tjen
Player
Dayeon Back
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
101)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dayeon Back
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dayeon Back
Player
Punnin Kovapitukted
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Janice Tjen
Player
Dayeon Back
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dayeon Back
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dayeon Back
Player
Rina Saigo
58%
(
73 of
125)
1st Serve %
77%
(
104 of
135)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
48%
(
25 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
43%
(
54 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
68 of
135)
139
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aunchisa Chanta
Player
Mika Buchnik
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mika Buchnik
Player
Yanni Liu
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
53%
(
51 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
49 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alisa Kummel
Player
Mika Buchnik
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dayeon Back
Player
Mika Buchnik
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Mika Buchnik
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mika Buchnik
Player
Heidi Felicia Schmal
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Mika Buchnik
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
50%
(
19 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
46
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Mika Buchnik
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
69% (171/78) | Win/Loss | 53% (23/20) |
65% (366/194) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (53/43) |
58% (2809/2068) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (421/393) |
70% (155/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (21/19) |
62% (8/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) |
62% (8/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
113 | Aces Total | 39 |
0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.45 |
319 | Total Double Faults | 176 |
1:26:45 | Average Match Time | 1:28:42 |
450.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.72 |
69% (9332/13562) | 1st Serve % | 57% (1410/2464) |
60% (5579/9332) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (833/1410) |
46% (1953/4230) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (464/1054) |
51% (1004/1983) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (172/319) |
50% (6768/13462) | Return Points Win % | 49% (1148/2367) |
63% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50% (3/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
63% (59/35) | Challenger W/L | 60% (12/8) |
74% (104/37) | Futures W/L | 48% (11/12) |
68% (167/244) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (22/42) |
55% (24/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (5/5) |
59% (39/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 27% (3/11) |
90% (162/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (25/22) |
10% (162/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (25/3) |
30% (87/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (18/1) |