Prediction of Dayeon Back [299th] vs Francesca Pace [616th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W L
Form
W L W W L W W W L LHead-To-Head: Back 1 - 0 Pace
They have played 2 sets in total, with Back winning 2 and Pace winning 0. The last match between Back and Pace was at the W35 Nonthaburi, 13-03-2025, Second, Hard with Dayeon Back getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dayeon Back | 1 |
| Francesca Pace | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Dayeon Back
Player
Francesca Pace
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:40:41 | Average Match Time | 1:40:41 |
| 71% (49/69) | 1st Serve % | 69% (37/54) |
| 59% (29/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (21/37) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 52% (28/54) | Return Points Win % | 43% (30/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dayeon Back vs Francesca Pace Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Back 1 - 0 Pace
Editorial Prediction:
When assessing the likelihood of a victory in an upcoming tennis match, the performance on the second serve acts as a crucial indicator. Over the past six months, Back has secured 36.38% of points with their second serve, while Pace stands ahead with 40.22%. Will this give Pace the advantage? It suggests a minor edge, but in the realm of tennis, even such slight differences can influence the tide of a match.
Moving to return game statistics, Back has been more prolific against their opponents' second serves, capturing 52.54% of those points. In comparison, Pace lags slightly behind at 50.17%. Their prowess is almost neck and neck when facing first serves, with Back at 34.43% and Pace marginally trailing at 34.04%. Could Back's superior returns guide them to victory?
When under pressure, particularly during breakpoints, Back has shown resilience, saving 44.86% of these critical opportunities against them, outpacing Pace's 40.09%. This ability to stave off opponents' advances may tip live betting scales and forecasts in Back's favor.
Looking at annual performance overview, Back has exhibited dominance with a 73.61% win rate this past year, translating to a record of 53 wins against 19 losses. Comparatively, Pace's win rate of 59.32%, with 35 victories to 24 defeats, cannot be overlooked. Does this overall consistency favor Back?
The preferred playing surfaces add another layer to the analysis. Hard courts bring out the best in Back, boasting a 70% career win rate. Conversely, Pace finds comfort on clay, although with a more modest 50% win rate. Which surface tips are vital? Given Back's higher success rate on hard, this tilt might favor them, especially on this surface.
Throughout the previous year, competing primarily on the Challengers/ITF circuit, Back managed a 68.42% win rate compared to Pace's 57.14%. This illustrates that Back thrives at the same competitive tier as Pace, reinforcing their edge in differing match levels.
Who has faced tougher competition? Over the year, Back played challengers with an average ranking of 428.31, whereas Pace battled better-ranking opponents at an average of 161.58. While this indicates Pace's potentially tougher road, the significance lies in Back's adaptation and victory rate.
In tight finishes, with matches heading into deciding sets, Back fans should feel optimistic. Triumphing in 67% of deciding sets over the past year, Back showcases clutch capabilities. Meanwhile, Pace's success stands at a respectable 52%, but is it enough?
When break point conversion is discussed, Back narrowly edges out with a 41.3% success rate, just surpassing Pace's 40.85%. This harbinger of in-game potential hints once more at Back's slight upper hand in crucial moments.
In culmination, given Back's superior performance in decisive scenarios, their return stats, and higher success in comparable match levels, the prediction aligns towards favoring Back to clinch the win in this head-to-head encounter. Will these statistics play out true on the court?
Dayeon Back Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Aunchisa Chanta
Player
Dayeon Back
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Yuki Naito
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Rinko Matsuda
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Kamonwan Yodpetch
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Matilde Mariani
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
Dayeon Back
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Polina Iatcenko
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
69 of
100)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Francesca Pace
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Mika Buchnik
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Francesca Pace Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Francesca Pace
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Francesca Pace
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Weronika Ewald
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Yui Ohwaki
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Saumya Vig
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
20 of
32)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Francesca Pace
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Prathyusha Rachapudi
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
42%
(
20 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Anjali Rathi
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Francesca Pace
42%
(
30 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69% (161/72) | Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) |
| 66% (345/178) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (106/112) |
| 58% (2634/1905) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (984/982) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 104 | Aces Total | 144 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 282 | Total Double Faults | 393 |
| 1:27:14 | Average Match Time | 1:31:55 |
| 454.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 424.57 |
| 69% (8853/12802) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3620/5682) |
| 60% (5271/8853) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2130/3620) |
| 47% (1837/3949) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (864/2062) |
| 51% (959/1869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (351/697) |
| 50% (6421/12719) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2547/5430) |
| 69% (157/228) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (45/93) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (24/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 57% (35/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 89% (152/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (38/33) |
| 11% (152/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (38/5) |
| 31% (81/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (55/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
