Dax Donders vs Karim Ibrahim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W W L
Form
L W W W L W L W L LH2H: Donders 0 - 1 Ibrahim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Donders winning 0 and Ibrahim winning 2. The last match between Donders and Ibrahim was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 18-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Karim Ibrahim getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dax Donders | 0 |
| Karim Ibrahim | 1 |
M15 Sharm ElSheikh(18-02-2025)
6
3
6
4
| Donders | Stats | Ibrahim |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (6-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (7-7) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | ||
| 24 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (124-105) | Career Total W/L | 46% (67-80) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Karim Ibrahim
Player
Dax Donders
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:5:32 | Average Match Time | 1:5:32 |
| 71% (36/51) | 1st Serve % | 71% (41/58) |
| 72% (26/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (33/41) |
| 47% (7/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8/17) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 29% (17/58) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18/51) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dax Donders vs Karim Ibrahim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dax Donders 0 - 1 Karim Ibrahim
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, there has been a notable disparity in second serve performance between Donders and Ibrahim. Donders has triumphed in an impressive 50.52% of points on their second serve, whereas Ibrahim falls slightly behind with a success rate of 45.48%. It is worth mentioning that there exists a remarkably strong correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Evaluation of Return Game Stats: Recent return game statistics shed light on Donders' superiority in recent form. Donders has achieved victory in an admirable 48.82% of their opponent's second serve points, outshining Ibrahim, who has claimed a slightly lower percentage of 48.29%. When considering first serve returns, the contrasting figures emphasize the extent to which Donders currently dominates in this area with a success rate of 33.64%, as Ibrahim lags behind at 22.13%. These statistics provide crucial insight into determining the favored player in their head-to-head match-up.
Under Pressure Analysis: A vital statistic to consider when making in-game betting predictions is how players fare under pressure. Donders has exemplified remarkable resilience in recent form by saving an impressive 64.29% of breakpoints. Meanwhile, Ibrahim has also displayed commendable composure, saving 53.13% of these crucial moments.
Performance Overview: In the past year, Donders has exhibited a commendable performance, winning 56.41% of the matches they have played (with a win-loss record of 22/17). Similarly, Ibrahim has boasted a near-equivalent success rate of 56.36% (with a win-loss record of 31/24). These overall figures provide a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head encounter.
Identification of Best Surface: Donders' career win percentage on Hard courts stands at an impressive 58% (with a win-loss record of 49/35), solidifying it as their most successful surface. Conversely, their performance on I.hard courts has been comparatively weaker, with a win percentage of only 44% (with a win-loss record of 4/5). Ibrahim's career win percentage on Hard courts is slightly lower at 48% (with a win-loss record of 52/57), while their weakest performance is observed on Clay courts, where they have secured a win percentage of 39% (with a win-loss record of 12/19).
Player Level Assessment: Over the past year, Donders has predominantly competed in tournaments at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level with a $10K prize, attaining a commendable victory rate of 56.41% (with a win-loss record of 22/17). In parallel, Ibrahim has predominantly participated in tournaments within the same category, achieving a similar success rate of 56.36% (with a win-loss record of 31/24). Therefore, when comparing the statistics between these players to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative event level at which they have been performing.
Assessment of Opponent Quality Stats: Throughout the past 12 months, Donders has consistently faced opponents with an average rank of 225.36, highlighting the formidable competition they have encountered. In contrast, Ibrahim has competed against players with a marginally lower average rank of 208.07. These statistics provide further context when evaluating the predicted outcome of their match.
Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: In the context of live predictions and betting, it is worth noting the contrasting performance of these players when matches progress to a deciding set. Over the past year, Donders has demonstrated a lackluster record, failing to secure a single victory in any deciding sets. In contrast, Ibrahim has impressively triumphed in 57% of all matches that reached a deciding set. These figures emphasize the significance of this factor when making predictions.
Current Event Head-to-head (H2H) Stats: While reflecting on past player performances is undeniably helpful in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider the current event statistics when gauging the form of players. For an indication of which player is currently in peak form, it is essential to refer to the section below (if applicable), which highlights their performance in the ongoing event. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge that certain players may exhibit heightened performance levels at specific events, which should be taken into account when making predictions.
Break Point Conversion: Recent statistics reveal that Donders has capitalized on 44% of their breakpoint opportunities, showcasing their ability to seize crucial moments in the match. In comparison, Ibrahim has showcased slightly superior proficiency in converting these chances, successfully capitalizing on 46.43% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve. These numbers hold significance in offering betting tips for live in-game predictions when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are eager to explore models that effectively predict the outcomes of tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent point of departure. However, please note that it caters primarily to statistics enthusiasts.
Dax Donders Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Dax Donders
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 1-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Karim Ibrahim
Player
Dax Donders
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Karim Ibrahim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Moroni
Player
Karim Ibrahim
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Karim Ibrahim
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karim Ibrahim
Player
Boris Butulija
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Karim Ibrahim
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
8 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karim Ibrahim
Player
Simon Norrman
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Balshaw
Player
Karim Ibrahim
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karim Ibrahim
Player
Dax Donders
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (124/105) | Win/Loss | 46% (67/80) |
| 54% (269/230) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (151/176) |
| 52% (2436/2208) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1518/1608) |
| 58% (51/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (55/61) |
| 52% (68/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (12/19) |
| 45% (5/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 233 | Aces Total | 420 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 357 | Total Double Faults | 179 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 310.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 283.07 |
| 60% (4676/7782) | 1st Serve % | 57% (2642/4612) |
| 64% (2997/4676) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (1864/2642) |
| 48% (1494/3106) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (866/1970) |
| 44% (356/813) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (144/335) |
| 41% (3240/7900) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1616/4551) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (124/105) | Futures W/L | 46% (67/80) |
| 54% (121/223) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (66/145) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (22/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (10/25) |
| 49% (22/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (17/36) |
| 88% (123/108) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (64/57) |
| 11% (123/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (64/7) |
| 14% (106/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (82/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
