Davide Galoppini vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Galoppini vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Davide Galoppini vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Galoppini has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fatic has won 47.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Galoppini, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 46.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Galoppini has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 56.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Galoppini has won 25% of matches played (W/L 5/ 15), with Fatic winning 53.62% (W/L 37/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Galoppini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 302/ 267), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Galoppini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 26.32% of matches (W/L 5/ 14), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Galoppini winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Galoppini winning 3 and Fatic winning 2. The last match between Galoppini and Fatic was at the Turkey F11 (Antalya), 21-03-2017, First, Clay with Davide Galoppini getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Galoppini and Fatic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Galoppini winning 0 times and Fatic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Galoppini winning 0, and Fatic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Galoppini has played against opponents with an average rank of 90.05 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 273.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Galoppini has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Galoppini has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 40.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Galoppini 1 - 1 Fatic
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
885
Rank
489
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
53% (317-284)
Career Total W/L
57% (339-252)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$73,995
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Davide Galoppini | Nerman Fatic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
Games Won | 21 | 20 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:57:0 | 1:57:0 |
1st Serve % | 74% (114/154) | 74% (86/117) |
1st Serve Win% | 50% (57/114) | 51% (44/86) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (21/40) | 39% (12/31) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (10/19) | 53% (10/19) |
Return Points W% | 52% (61/117) | 49% (76/154) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
Davide Galoppini
Player
Nerman Fatic
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
6-2 2-6 6-1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Davide Galoppini
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
72 of
93)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
93)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Davide Galoppini | Nerman Fatic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (15/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (150/179) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.43 |
Aces Total | 0 | 70 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 0 | 33 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:7 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 343.87 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (574/926) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (393/574) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (167/352) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (27/81) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (360/982) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/7) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (7/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Davide Galoppini Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Branko Djuric
Player
Davide Galoppini
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Davide Galoppini
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Davide Galoppini
Player
Filippo Speziali
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Davide Galoppini
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
52%
(
45 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
0-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Davide Galoppini
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Davide Galoppini
Player
Marco Furlanetto
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicolo Pozzani
Player
Davide Galoppini
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fnu Nidunjianzan
Player
Davide Galoppini
63%
(
78 of
124)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
48%
(
60 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Barrena
Player
Davide Galoppini
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more