David Pichler vs Alessandro Ingarao Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pichler vs Ingarao analysis and find out who is favored!
David Pichler vs Alessandro Ingarao Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pichler has won 48.72% of points on his second serve, while Ingarao has won 42.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pichler, in recent form, has won 54.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ingarao has won 52.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.49% and 42.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pichler has saved 54.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ingarao has saved 47.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pichler has won 46.97% of matches played (W/L 31/ 35), with Ingarao winning 70% (W/L 14/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ingarao has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 68/ 56), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20), where as Ingarao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 14/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pichler winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pichler winning 2 and Ingarao winning 1. The last match between Pichler and Ingarao was at the M25 Santa Margherita Di Pula, 16-04-2019, Q3, Clay with David Pichler getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pichler and Ingarao have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pichler winning 1 times and Ingarao 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pichler winning 0, and Ingarao 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pichler has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.3 while Ingarao has played against players with an average rank of 75.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pichler has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ingarao has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pichler has converted 47.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ingarao has converted 53.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pichler 1 - 0 Ingarao
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
563
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
855
Rank
799
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (339-263)
Career Total W/L
52% (79-72)
43% (6-8)
YTD W/L
75% (6-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | David Pichler | Alessandro Ingarao |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:47:0 | 1:47:0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (41/66) | 78% (53/68) |
1st Serve Win% | 51% (21/41) | 58% (31/53) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 40% (6/15) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 46% (31/68) | 53% (35/66) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-6 6-4 11-9 |
David Pichler
Player
Alessandro Ingarao
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
53%
(
35 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
72
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | David Pichler | Alessandro Ingarao |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 75% (6/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (17/17) | 72% (13/5) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (157/156) | 61% (100/63) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 75% (6/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.01 |
Aces Total | 48 | 1 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.07 |
DFs Total | 43 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:48 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 307.5 | 39.75 |
1st Serve % | 62% (603/966) | 72% (173/239) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (419/603) | 62% (107/173) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (175/363) | 44% (29/66) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (41/90) | 58% (15/26) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (385/979) | 45% (98/217) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 75% (6/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (6/13) | 75% (6/8) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 86% (7/6) |
1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 14% (7/1) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (1/0) |
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
David Pichler
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
David Pichler
Player
Akram El Sallaly
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
David Pichler
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Laurent Lokoli
Player
David Pichler
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
David Pichler
75%
(
76 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
David Pichler
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Alessandro Ingarao Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 1-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Alessandro Ingarao
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alessandro Ingarao
Player
Leo Borg
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(13) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alessandro Ingarao
Player
Ivan Kazakov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
25 of
33)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alessandro Ingarao
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Alessandro Ingarao
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alessandro Ingarao
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more