Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Rice vs James Cluskey Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rice vs Cluskey analysis and find out who is favored!
David Rice vs James Cluskey Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rice has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Cluskey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rice, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cluskey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rice has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cluskey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rice has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cluskey winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rice has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 140/ 90), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 14/ 35). Cluskey has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 13/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rice winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rice winning 2 and Cluskey winning 0. The last match between Rice and Cluskey was at the Izmir Challenger, 15-09-2012, Q1 round, Hard with David Rice getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rice and Cluskey have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rice winning 0 times and Cluskey 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rice winning 0, and Cluskey 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rice has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cluskey has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rice has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cluskey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rice has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cluskey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rice 1 - 0 Cluskey
Ret.
Rank
283
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
37
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
55% (290-239)
Career Total W/L
34% (23-44)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$12,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Rice | James Cluskey |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:1:37 | 1:1:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (19/36) | 39% (21/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (14/19) | 52% (11/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 27% (9/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (34/54) | 36% (13/36) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
David Rice
Player
James Cluskey
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Rice | James Cluskey |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
David Rice Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
David Rice
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
David Rice
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
David Rice
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kirill Dmitriev
Player
David Rice
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
14
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
David Rice
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Farris Fathi Gosea
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Alexander A. Jesse
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
David Rice
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Maxime Tchoutakian
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
David Rice
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
James Cluskey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
James Cluskey
Player
Ji Hun Park
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ze Zhang
Player
James Cluskey
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Gomez
Player
James Cluskey
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
2
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Spencer Papa
Player
James Cluskey
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
James Cluskey
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Punnakrit Kritakara
Player
James Cluskey
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kudryavtsev
Player
James Cluskey
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
95%
(
36 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
6 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Rice Vs Cluskey Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
