Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Poljak vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poljak vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
David Poljak vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poljak has won 49% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poljak, in recent form, has won 49.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Poljak has saved 58.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Poljak has won 40.48% of matches played (W/L 17/ 25), with Nijboer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 103/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 104/ 107). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/ 20), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poljak has played against opponents with an average rank of 149.12 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poljak has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Poljak has converted 34.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Poljak 0 - 0 Nijboer
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Poljak | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (18/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (213/211) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 119 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:24 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 125.17 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (835/1375) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (615/835) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (267/540) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (40/115) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (482/1333) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Matej Vocel
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
James Watt
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Nikita Ianin
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | bye | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nikita Ianin
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
David Poljak
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Poljak Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share
