David Poljak vs Patric Prinoth Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W W W L
Form
L L L L W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Poljak 1 - 0 Prinoth
They have played 2 sets in total, with Poljak winning 2 and Prinoth winning 0. The last match between Poljak and Prinoth was at the M25 Trento, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with David Poljak getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| David Poljak | 1 |
| Patric Prinoth | 0 |
M25 Trento(16-02-2025)
6
4
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Sherif PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Michelsen VS Carabelli PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
David Poljak
Player
Patric Prinoth
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
8
4
Aces (Total)
8
0
Total Double Faults
4
1:12:36
Average Match Time
1:12:36
51% (25/49)
1st Serve %
59% (40/68)
88% (22/25)
1st Serve Win %
73% (29/40)
75% (18/24)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (13/28)
22% (2/9)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
38% (26/68)
Return Points Win %
18% (9/49)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
David Poljak vs Patric Prinoth Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: David Poljak 1 - 0 Patric Prinoth
Predicting the Outcome of an Upcoming Tennis Match:
Second Serve Performance in Recent Form: Within the past six months, there has been a discernible disparity in the second serve performance between Poljak and Prinoth. Poljak has demonstrated an exceptional mastery of this aspect by winning 50.36% of points on the second serve, whereas Prinoth has managed a comparatively lower success rate of 37.27%. It is noteworthy that there exists a profound correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Recent Return Game Statistics: An analysis of return game statistics sheds light on the prowess of Poljak and Prinoth. Poljak, in their recent form, has exhibited an astounding ability to win 52.9% of their opponents' second serve points. On the other hand, Prinoth has displayed a slightly lower success rate of 48.05% in accomplishing a comparable feat. This trend remains consistent when considering first serve returns, with Poljak achieving a rate of 29.79% and Prinoth following closely at 28.65%. Such statistics hold significant value in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: Under intense pressure, Poljak has managed to save a commendable 56.8% of breakpoints in their recent performances. In contrast, Prinoth has demonstrated an even higher level of proficiency by saving an impressive 72% of breakpoints. This particular statistic serves as a valuable resource for predicting in-game betting outcomes.
Performance Overview: Over the past year, Poljak has achieved a winning percentage of 55.32% in the matches they have played (with a win-loss record of 26/21). Conversely, Prinoth has experienced a less triumphant journey, securing victory in only 28.57% of their matches (with a win-loss record of 8/20). Taking all factors into consideration, these performance indicators provide a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Surface Proficiency: When it comes to surface preferences, Poljak has showcased an unparalleled mastery on Hard courts, amassing a 59% win rate (with a win-loss record of 108/74). However, their success rate drops when competing on Clay courts, with only a 49% win rate (with a win-loss record of 109/112). In the case of Prinoth, their highest career surface win percentage lies on Indoor Hard courts, with a 33% success rate (with a win-loss record of 14/29). In contrast, their performance on Grass courts has proven to be less favorable, resulting in a 0% win rate (with a win-loss record of 0/1).
Player Level Considerations: Over the past year, Poljak has primarily participated in tournaments at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level, particularly in the $10K category. Their impressive win rate of 59.09% (with a win-loss record of 26/18) showcases their skill in this domain. On the other hand, Prinoth has also competed predominantly in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level. However, their success rate stands at a comparatively lower 28.57% (with a win-loss record of 8/20). Therefore, when comparing players' statistics to predict the favored contender, it is essential to consider the event level at which they have been competing.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Poljak has faced opponents with an average rank of 310.34, while Prinoth has encountered players with an average rank of 55.39. These figures provide additional insights into the level of competitiveness and the caliber of opponents faced by each player.
Deciding Set Performance Against All Players: For live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it is crucial to evaluate players' performance in deciding sets. In the past year, Poljak has emerged victorious in 50% of deciding sets, emphasizing their remarkable skill in this critical phase of the game. In contrast, Prinoth has achieved triumph in only 14% of all matches played on the tour, suggesting a potential area of weakness under high-pressure situations.
Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performance remains valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to consider current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. It is thus advisable to refer to the section below for up-to-date event stats (click here) if either player has competed in the ongoing event. Additionally, it is worth noting that certain players may exhibit superior performance levels during specific events, thereby influencing the likely outcome of the match.
Break Point Conversion: In recent encounters, Poljak has impressively converted 42.07% of their breakpoint opportunities, signifying a heightened likelihood of seizing critical moments to break their opponent's serve. Comparatively, Prinoth has converted 30.77% of their chances to break their opponents' serve, suggesting a somewhat lesser effectiveness in capitalizing on such crucial junctures. This particular statistic serves as a telling factor for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves facing a breakpoint opportunity.
If you take an avid interest in models that predict tennis matches, I would recommend diving into this article (Warning: Stats geeks only).
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Poljak
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Simon Reveniau
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-7(11) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Louis Larue
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Arthur Laborde
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
William Jucha
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
18 of
24)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
30
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Schaer
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
2
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(3) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Hugo Ouzilou
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
55%
(
11 of
20)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
23
Total Points Won
13
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
David Poljak
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stefano D'Agostino
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Federico Salomone
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Patric Prinoth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Schaer
Player
Patric Prinoth
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
4
Aces
8
11
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(8) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Patric Prinoth
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (336/276)
Win/Loss
30% (69/162)
54% (765/657)
Sets Win/Loss
34% (172/339)
52% (7020/6548)
Games Win/Loss
43% (2095/2770)
59% (108/74)
Hard Win/Loss
24% (8/26)
49% (109/112)
Clay Win/Loss
32% (44/95)
57% (118/89)
Indoor Hard W/L
30% (17/40)
50% (1/1)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.39
Aces Per Game
0.13
2588
Aces Total
305
0.24
Double Faults Per Game
0.09
1598
Total Double Faults
207
1:23:11
Average Match Time
1st Match
516.19
Average Opponent Rank
234.08
60% (21912/36729)
1st Serve %
57% (2785/4910)
70% (15358/21912)
1st Serve Win %
65% (1819/2785)
48% (7179/14816)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (929/2125)
43% (1489/3427)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (132/315)
39% (14115/35966)
Return Points Win %
35% (1542/4466)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
39% (44/69)
Challenger W/L
14% (2/12)
59% (292/207)
Futures W/L
31% (67/150)
55% (331/606)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
30% (69/230)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
52% (97/188)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (28/54)
51% (104/203)
Deciding Set Win %
32% (16/50)
83% (333/278)
1st Set Won, Won Match
78% (74/58)
17% (333/55)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
22% (74/16)
20% (279/56)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
7% (157/11)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
