Prediction of David Poljak vs Marek Gengel Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
2 - 5
54% (323-270)
Career Total W/L
59% (362-251)
67% (2-1)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,280
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Marek Gengel
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
7
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
111
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
David Poljak
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
96)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Marek Gengel
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
3
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 5-7 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
David Poljak
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| stats | David Poljak | Marek Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 5 |
| Sets Won | 7 | 11 |
| Games Won | 85 | 92 |
| Aces (Total) | 32 | 35 |
| Total Double Faults | 22 | 12 |
| Average Match Time | 1:29:30 | 1:29:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (316/514) | 62% (274/440) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (213/316) | 78% (215/274) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (99/198) | 52% (87/166) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (14/21) | 38% (20/52) |
| Return Points Win % | 31% (138/440) | 39% (202/514) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) | 71% (5/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 25% (4/1) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 75% (4/3) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) | 75% (4/3) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
James Story
Player
David Poljak
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Tom Hands
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Daniel Leong Prickett
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
7
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
111
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Karim Mabrouk
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Nicolo Consonni
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Jakub Jedrzejczak
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karl Poling
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pawit Sornlaksup
Player
Marek Gengel
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve %
50%
(
9 of
18)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
4 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
10
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Ilia Simakin
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Mohamed Safwat
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Dimitris Sakellaridis
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
7
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
111
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Stefano D'Agostino
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Ilia Simakin
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Vadym Ursu
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Mohamed Safwat
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Poljak | Marek Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 54% (323/270) | 59% (362/251) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (736/642) | 57% (803/597) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (6770/6343) | 53% (6964/6177) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (108/74) | 68% (258/124) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 49% (109/112) | 41% (56/79) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (105/83) | 51% (48/46) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.39 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 2494 | 2691 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 | 0.19 |
| Total Double Faults | 1577 | 1211 |
| Average Match Time | 1:23:36 | 1:18:30 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 526.04 | 511.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (21280/35730) | 63% (22639/35794) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14891/21280) | 70% (15924/22639) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6989/14449) | 50% (6573/13154) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1449/3338) | 43% (1580/3703) |
| Return Points Win % | 39% (13718/34969) | 40% (14685/36661) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 39% (44/69) | 37% (43/72) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (279/201) | 65% (318/172) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (318/587) | 59% (358/604) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (92/182) | 54% (92/169) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 51% (101/197) | 54% (98/180) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (318/266) | 88% (350/308) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (318/52) | 12% (350/41) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (275/55) | 20% (262/53) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
