David Poljak vs Jan Jermar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W W W L
Form
W L L L W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Poljak 1 - 0 Jermar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Poljak winning 2 and Jermar winning 0. The last match between Poljak and Jermar was at the M25 Trento, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with David Poljak getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| David Poljak | 1 |
| Jan Jermar | 0 |
M25 Trento(17-02-2025)
7
6
6
1
| Poljak | Stats | Jermar |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (15-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (5-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 896 | Ranking | N/A |
| 370 | Highest Rank | |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (336-276) | Career Total W/L | 43% (71-93) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Eala PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-1 |
Stats 
David Poljak
Player
Jan Jermar
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:24:30 | Average Match Time | 1:24:30 |
| 58% (39/67) | 1st Serve % | 75% (50/67) |
| 74% (29/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (30/50) |
| 54% (15/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 46% (31/67) | Return Points Win % | 34% (23/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
David Poljak vs Jan Jermar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: David Poljak 1 - 0 Jan Jermar
- Analyze Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Poljak has exhibited remarkable prowess on their second serve, emerging victorious in 51.38% of points. Conversely, Jermar has achieved a commendable 48.09% success rate. This statistical observation holds a profound influence on the accuracy of match predictions.
- Examine Return Game Statistics: Recent return game statistics divulge Poljak's proficiency in winning 52.93% of their opponent's second serve points, underlining their undeniable prowess. Jermar, while impressive, has secured only 47.03% in this domain. First serve returns present a similar story, with Poljak standing at 29.7% and Jermar at 29.36%. This correlation predicts the dominant player in their impending head-to-head confrontation.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When subjected to significant pressure, Poljak has demonstrated exceptional resilience by saving 56.8% of breakpoints in recent matches. Jermar, while still commendable, has managed to salvage 51.81% of these critical moments. This is a pivotal statistic for bettors aiming to make informed predictions during the course of the game.
- Performance Overview: With an impressive record of winning 56.25% of their matches over the past year (with a win-loss ratio of 27/21), Poljak has consistently proven themselves to be a formidable competitor. Meanwhile, Jermar boasts a respectable winning percentage of 51.11% (W/L 23/22). Considering these figures, a comprehensive overview emerges, granting insights into the head-to-head prediction.
- Analyze Preferred Playing Surfaces: Poljak has exhibited their mastery on the hard surface, achieving a remarkable 59% success rate (W/L 108/74). However, their performance on clay courts leaves room for improvement, with a win percentage of 49% (W/L 109/112). On the other hand, Jermar thrives on hard courts, boasting a win percentage of 49% (W/L 20/21), yet struggling on clay with only a 40% success rate (W/L 34/50).
- Evaluate Player Levels: Over the past year, Poljak has primarily participated in the highly competitive Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments valuing $10,000. Their exceptional performance at this level is evident, winning 60% of matches (W/L 27/18). In contrast, Jermar has primarily played in the same category of tournaments, achieving a slightly lower win percentage of 52.27% (W/L 23/21). It is crucial to note that predictions concerning player preference are relative to the level of the event they have been competing in.
- Consider Opponent Quality: During the last twelve months, Poljak has confronted adversaries with an average ranking of 305.17, exemplifying their resilience against formidable opponents. In comparison, Jermar has faced opponents with an average ranking of 165.31, hinting at their ability to prevail against opponents of higher caliber.
- Evaluate Deciding Set Performance: For enthusiasts of live predictions and betting, it is imperative to note that if this match enters a deciding set, Poljak has triumphed in 50% of such crucial moments over the past year. Conversely, Jermar has displayed a success rate of 27% in all matches played on tour. These percentages offer invaluable insights for in-game predictions.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance proves instrumental in predicting tennis matches, analyzing current event statistics provides a clear indication of a player's current form. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the relevant section below to observe their performance in the ongoing event. Furthermore, specific players may exhibit enhanced performance at particular events, a factor that must be carefully considered when making predictions regarding the forthcoming outcome.
- Examine Break Point Conversion: Recently, Poljak has capitalized on 40.91% of their breakpoint opportunities, effectively capitalizing on pivotal moments to seize the advantage. Jermar, operating at an impressive efficiency, has converted 38.55% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. These statistics are particularly informative for live betting tips, highlighting the significance of breakpoints during gameplay.
- If you are captivated by the world of tennis prediction models, this compilation serves as an excellent starting point. However, be warned, it caters exclusively to the discerning enthusiasts of statistical analysis.
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Poljak
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Simon Reveniau
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-7(11) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Louis Larue
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Arthur Laborde
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
William Jucha
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
18 of
24)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
30
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Schaer
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
2
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(3) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Hugo Ouzilou
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
55%
(
11 of
20)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
23
Total Points Won
13
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
David Poljak
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stefano D'Agostino
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Federico Salomone
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jan Jermar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Jan Jermar
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve %
78%
(
14 of
18)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
17
Total Points Won
15
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Jermar
Player
Jannik Opitz
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Jermar
Player
Louis Binet
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
6
Total Points Won
7
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Jan Jermar
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Jermar
Player
Gilberto Ravasio
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
11
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Francois Musitelli
Player
Jan Jermar
50%
(
9 of
18)
1st Serve %
50%
(
6 of
12)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
18
Total Points Won
12
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antoine Vincent
Player
Jan Jermar
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Jermar
Player
Gabriel Gomez
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (336/276) | Win/Loss | 43% (71/93) |
| 54% (765/657) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (163/202) |
| 52% (7020/6548) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (1684/1825) |
| 59% (108/74) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (20/21) |
| 49% (109/112) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (34/50) |
| 57% (118/89) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (17/22) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2588 | Aces Total | 323 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1598 | Total Double Faults | 166 |
| 1:23:11 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 516.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 190.11 |
| 60% (21912/36729) | 1st Serve % | 66% (3186/4854) |
| 70% (15358/21912) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2116/3186) |
| 48% (7179/14816) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (774/1668) |
| 43% (1489/3427) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (130/295) |
| 39% (14115/35966) | Return Points Win % | 34% (1473/4385) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (44/69) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 59% (292/207) | Futures W/L | 44% (71/90) |
| 55% (331/606) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (70/163) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (97/188) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (22/40) |
| 51% (104/203) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (16/38) |
| 83% (333/278) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (73/63) |
| 17% (333/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (73/10) |
| 20% (279/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (91/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
