Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Pichler vs Mikhail Fufygin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pichler vs Fufygin analysis and find out who is favored!
David Pichler vs Mikhail Fufygin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pichler has won 50.42% of points on his second serve, while Fufygin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pichler, in recent form, has won 53.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fufygin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.65% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pichler has saved 56.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fufygin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pichler has won 45.9% of matches played (W/L 28/ 33), with Fufygin winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fufygin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 144/ 110), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 84/ 91).
- Player level: In the last year, Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18), where as Fufygin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pichler has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.36 while Fufygin has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pichler has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fufygin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pichler has converted 45.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fufygin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pichler 0 - 0 Fufygin
574
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
898
Rank
484
High
33
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
56% (340-264)
Career Total W/L
54% (292-251)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,210
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Pichler | Mikhail Fufygin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (19/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (175/172) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:6 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 300.19 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (673/1070) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (462/673) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (196/397) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (46/103) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (442/1112) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
David Pichler
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Akram El Sallaly
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
David Pichler
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
David Pichler
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Mikhail Fufygin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sami Ben Abdennibi
Player
Mikhail Fufygin
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Fufygin
Player
Mousa Zayed
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Fufygin
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Lacides
Player
Mikhail Fufygin
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Pichler Vs Fufygin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
