search

David Pichler vs Akram El Sallaly Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pichler vs Sallaly analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

David Pichler vs Akram El Sallaly Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Pichler 1 - 0 Sallaly

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pichler has won 49.65% of points on their second serve, while Sallaly has won 49.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pichler, in recent form, has won 53.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sallaly has won 49.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.3% and 32.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Pichler has saved 57.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sallaly has saved 51.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Pichler has won 50% of matches played (W/L 28/ 28), with Sallaly winning 42.42% (W/L 14/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Sallaly has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 43/ 61), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 46/ 71).
  • Player level: In the last year, Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16), where as Sallaly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.38% of matches (W/L 12/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pichler winning 1 times and Sallaly being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pichler winning 2 and Sallaly winning 0. The last match between Pichler and Sallaly was at the Kigali 2 Challenger, 06-03-2024, First, Clay with David Pichler getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:7.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Pichler and Sallaly have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pichler winning 0 times and Sallaly 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pichler winning 0, and Sallaly 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pichler has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.59 while Sallaly has played against players with an average rank of 126.27.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pichler has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sallaly has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Pichler has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sallaly has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
David Pichler

3

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

581

Rank

390

High

28

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

26

Age

Plays

Akram El Sallaly

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L L W L W W L L W L

Form

L L W W L L W L W L

56% (343-268)

Career Total W/L

40% (89-132)

43% (10-13)

YTD W/L

46% (6-7)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For David Pichler vs Akram El Sallaly For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Pichler VS Sallaly

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Pichler VS Sallaly H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats David Pichler Akram El Sallaly
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 5
Aces (Total) 1 3
DFs Total 0 3
Avg Match Time 1:28:7 1:28:7
1st Serve % 73% (29/40) 63% (44/70)
1st Serve Win% 69% (20/29) 52% (23/44)
2nd Serve Win% 64% (7/11) 38% (10/26)
BPs Won% (Total) 55% (6/11) 100% (2/2)
Return Points W% 53% (37/70) 33% (13/40)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Pichler VS Sallaly H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 6-3
cross
David Pichler
Player
Akram El Sallaly
73% ( 29 of 40)
1st Serve %
63% ( 44 of 70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69% ( 20 of 29)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 23 of 44)
64% ( 7 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
33% ( 13 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 37 of 70)
64
Total Points Won
46

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats David Pichler Akram El Sallaly
YTD W/L 43% (10/13) 46% (6/7)
Sets Win/Loss 51% (27/26) 48% (14/15)
Games Win/Loss 50% (246/244) 49% (139/144)
Hard Win/Loss 50% (4/4) 43% (3/4)
Clay Win/Loss 40% (6/9) 50% (3/3)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.3 0.12
Aces Total 72 16
DFs per game 0.29 0.28
DFs Total 69 38
Avg Match Time 1:44:12 1:9:21
Avg Opp Rank 248.87 286.85
1st Serve % 62% (962/1560) 66% (410/625)
1st Serve W% 69% (661/962) 61% (250/410)
2nd Serve W% 49% (296/598) 50% (107/215)
BPs Won% Total 46% (63/138) 50% (23/46)
Return Pts W% 40% (628/1587) 39% (222/574)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 43% (6/8) 50% (2/2)
Futures W/L 44% (4/5) 44% (4/5)
Best of 3 Sets W% 48% (10/21) 46% (6/13)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 60% (3/5) 50% (3/6)
Deciding Set W% 33% (3/9) 33% (1/3)
1st set W, W 83% (12/10) 100% (5/5)
1st set W, L 17% (12/2) 0% (5/0)
1st set L, W 9% (11/1) 13% (8/1)

David Pichler Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Timofey Skatov
Player
David Pichler
47% ( 32 of 68)
1st Serve %
52% ( 33 of 63)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
81% ( 26 of 32)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 24 of 33)
50% ( 18 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 11 of 30)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
35% ( 24 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 28 of 63)
72
Total Points Won
59
L
7-6(3) 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
David Pichler
Player
Sebastian Sorger
53% ( 58 of 109)
1st Serve %
56% ( 65 of 117)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
78% ( 45 of 58)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 45 of 65)
53% ( 27 of 51)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 27 of 52)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
34% ( 37 of 109)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 45 of 117)
117
Total Points Won
109
W
7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(8) H2H
R1
cross
Sebastian Sorger
Player
David Pichler
90% ( 9 of 10)
1st Serve %
54% ( 14 of 26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
56% ( 5 of 9)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 9 of 14)
0% ( 0 of 1)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 6 of 12)
17% ( 1 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
16
Total Points Won
20
L
2-3 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50% ( 36 of 72)
1st Serve %
43% ( 21 of 49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78% ( 28 of 36)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 12 of 21)
44% ( 16 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
39% ( 28 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 25 of 49)
69
Total Points Won
52
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68% ( 55 of 81)
1st Serve %
51% ( 25 of 49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64% ( 35 of 55)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 17 of 25)
58% ( 15 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 9 of 24)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
11% ( 1 of 9)
38% ( 31 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
73
Total Points Won
57
W
6-1 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59% ( 38 of 64)
1st Serve %
63% ( 40 of 64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76% ( 29 of 38)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 27 of 40)
46% ( 12 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 12 of 24)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
36% ( 23 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 25 of 64)
66
Total Points Won
62
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58% ( 55 of 95)
1st Serve %
71% ( 70 of 98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69% ( 38 of 55)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 45 of 70)
53% ( 21 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
38% ( 36 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 36 of 98)
95
Total Points Won
98
L
6-4 2-6 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78% ( 39 of 50)
1st Serve %
46% ( 33 of 71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
73% ( 8 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 16 of 38)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
26% ( 13 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 35 of 71)
72
Total Points Won
49
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56% ( 35 of 62)
1st Serve %
57% ( 31 of 54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77% ( 27 of 35)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 13 of 23)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
35% ( 22 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 27 of 54)
67
Total Points Won
49
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65% ( 53 of 81)
1st Serve %
58% ( 55 of 95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75% ( 40 of 53)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 44 of 55)
46% ( 13 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 16 of 40)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
35% ( 28 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 35 of 95)
88
Total Points Won
88
L
3-6 6-4 6-4 H2H

Akram El Sallaly Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Leo Matthysen
Player
Akram El Sallaly
56% ( 28 of 50)
1st Serve %
88% ( 37 of 42)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
71% ( 20 of 28)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 17 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
55
Total Points Won
37
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Akram El Sallaly
Player
Alexander Donski
75% ( 60 of 80)
1st Serve %
53% ( 31 of 58)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
68% ( 41 of 60)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 22 of 31)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
35% ( 28 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 21 of 58)
73
Total Points Won
65
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Jesse Flores
Player
Akram El Sallaly
69% ( 45 of 65)
1st Serve %
73% ( 51 of 70)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
62% ( 28 of 45)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 26 of 51)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
42% ( 27 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 37 of 70)
75
Total Points Won
60
L
7-6(5) 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Akram El Sallaly
Player
Alex Kobelt
63% ( 76 of 120)
1st Serve %
55% ( 56 of 101)
1
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
62% ( 47 of 76)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 39 of 56)
52% ( 23 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 21 of 45)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
42% ( 50 of 120)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 41 of 101)
111
Total Points Won
110
W
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) H2H
Q1
L
7-6(5) 4-6 13-11 H2H
R1
cross
David Pichler
Player
Akram El Sallaly
73% ( 29 of 40)
1st Serve %
63% ( 44 of 70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69% ( 20 of 29)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 23 of 44)
64% ( 7 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
33% ( 13 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 37 of 70)
64
Total Points Won
46
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Akram El Sallaly
Player
Kelsey Stevenson
59% ( 49 of 83)
1st Serve %
60% ( 48 of 80)
5
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
80% ( 39 of 49)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 34 of 48)
56% ( 19 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 25 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 29 of 80)
87
Total Points Won
76
W
7-6(4) 7-6(1) H2H
Q1
cross
Akram El Sallaly
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
57% ( 27 of 47)
1st Serve %
75% ( 40 of 53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
56% ( 15 of 27)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 18 of 40)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
15% ( 2 of 13)
100% ( 7 of 7)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
43% ( 20 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 33 of 53)
60
Total Points Won
40
W
6-0 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Akram El Sallaly
67% ( 56 of 83)
1st Serve %
56% ( 39 of 70)
2
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
5
77% ( 43 of 56)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 29 of 39)
44% ( 12 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
34% ( 28 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 23 of 70)
78
Total Points Won
75
L
6-4 2-6 6-3 H2H
Q2
L
7-6(1) 6-1 H2H

Pichler Vs Sallaly Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Pichler are available here and Sallaly photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions