Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Perez Sanz vs Shintaro Imai Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sanz vs Imai analysis and find out who is favored!
David Perez Sanz vs Shintaro Imai Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sanz has won 51.36% of points on his second serve, while Imai has won 49.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sanz, in recent form, has won 53.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Imai has won 49.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.28% and 32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sanz has saved 58.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Imai has saved 56.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sanz has won 53.13% of matches played (W/L 17/ 15), with Imai winning 62.5% (W/L 15/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sanz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 289/ 135), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Imai has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 80% (W/L 4/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Sanz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.13% of matches (W/L 17/ 15), where as Imai has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sanz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sanz winning 2 and Imai winning 0. The last match between Sanz and Imai was at the Yokohama Challenger, 25-02-2019, First, Hard with David Perez Sanz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sanz and Imai have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sanz winning 0 times and Imai 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sanz winning 0, and Imai 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sanz has played against opponents with an average rank of 125.5 while Imai has played against players with an average rank of 265.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sanz has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Imai has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sanz has converted 41.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Imai has converted 45.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sanz 1 - 0 Imai
859
Rank
216
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
581
Rank
290
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
62% (446-271)
Career Total W/L
63% (280-161)
54% (7-6)
YTD W/L
67% (10-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Perez Sanz | Shintaro Imai |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:1 | 1:14:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (29/60) | 46% (23/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (24/29) | 74% (17/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (15/31) | 33% (9/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (24/50) | 35% (21/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
David Perez Sanz
Player
Shintaro Imai
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Perez Sanz | Shintaro Imai |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 67% (10/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (15/13) | 61% (22/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (131/126) | 53% (188/170) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 70% (7/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 88 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:9 | 1:57:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 70.15 | 183.87 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (509/792) | 62% (706/1131) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (335/509) | 72% (510/706) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (138/283) | 53% (224/425) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (41/105) | 44% (37/84) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (364/867) | 38% (412/1096) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) | 63% (5/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (7/12) | 67% (10/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 43% (7/3) |
David Perez Sanz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Szymon Kielan
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
David Perez Sanz
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
David Perez Sanz
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Gabriele Bosio
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
41%
(
29 of
70)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
David Perez Sanz
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
71%
(
10 of
14)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
8 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
7
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Donski
Player
David Perez Sanz
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Peter Nad
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
David Perez Sanz
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Emilien Demanet
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
110)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
49%
(
48 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Shintaro Imai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sora Fukuda
Player
Shintaro Imai
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Leo Vithoontien
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Kokoro Isomura
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Shintaro Imai
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Makoto Ochi
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Mason Naumovski
67%
(
74 of
110)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
14
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
41 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Hiroki Moriya
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Shintaro Imai
54%
(
54 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Klintcharov
Player
Shintaro Imai
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Shintaro Imai
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sanz Vs Imai Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
