Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Pel vs Tomas Papik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pel vs Papik analysis and find out who is favored!
David Pel vs Tomas Papik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Papik has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Papik has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Papik has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Papik winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 29/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Papik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 117/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Pel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Papik has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pel has played against opponents with an average rank of 486 while Papik has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Papik has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Papik has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pel 0 - 0 Papik
896
Rank
885
High
32
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
447
High
30
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
52% (92-84)
Career Total W/L
57% (181-139)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Pel | Tomas Papik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
David Pel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Damien Wenger
Player
David Pel
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrey Kuznetsov
Player
David Pel
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
0
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
5 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Romain Arneodo
Player
David Pel
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
David Pel
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Albano Olivetti
Player
David Pel
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
15
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isak Arvidsson
Player
David Pel
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Tomas Papik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Tomas Papik
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-6(3) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 1-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Simon
Player
Tomas Papik
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Papik
Player
Jonas Trinker
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tomas Papik
Player
Hendrik Jebens
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
6
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Tomas Papik
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Papik
Player
Jiri Jenicek
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Pel Vs Papik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
