Prediction of David Pate vs Libor Pimek Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Pate vs L. Pimek
David Pate
USA
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
63
Age
62
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'5" (196 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
18
Best Rank
21
2
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Libor Pimek
BEL
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
63
Age
62
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'5" (196 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
18
Best Rank
21
2
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Pate 1 - 1 Pimek
They have played 5 sets in total, with David Pate winning 3 and Libor Pimek winning 2. The last match between Libor Pimek and David Pate was at the Wembley, 10-11-1986, Round: QF, Surface: Carpet, with Libor Pimek getting the victory 6-7 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pate | 1 |
| Pimek | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) Wembley(11-10-86)
Libor Pimek
6
6
6
David Pate
7
2
2
(SF) La Quinta(02-18-85)
David Pate
7
6
Libor Pimek
6
4
D. Pate vs L. Pimek H2H Profile
D. Pate vs L. Pimek Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), David Pate has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Libor Pimek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show David Pate, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Libor Pimek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: David Pate has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Libor Pimek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year David Pate has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Libor Pimek winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: David Pate has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 123/99), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 5/14). Libor Pimek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 99/77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, David Pate has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Libor Pimek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with David Pate winning 1 times and Libor Pimek being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with David Pate winning 3 and Libor Pimek winning 2.
- The last match between David Pate and Libor Pimek was at the Wembley, 10-11-1986, Round: QF, Surface: Carpet, with Libor Pimek getting the victory 6-7 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, David Pate has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Libor Pimek has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, David Pate has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Libor Pimek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, David Pate has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Libor Pimek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
David Pate vs Libor Pimek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Pate vs L. Pimek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pate 0%, Pimek 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pate 0%, Pimek 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Pate 0%, Pimek 0%.
D. Pate Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tokyo - 10-04-1995 | ||||
R1  Kotaro MiyachiK. Miyachi | L | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | ||
| Tokyo - 04-04-1994 | ||||
R1 Shuzo MatsuokaS. Matsuoka | W | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
R2 Jonathan StarkJ. Stark | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
 Queen's Club - 07-06-1993 | ||||
R1  Jamie MorganJ. Morgan | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Scottsdale - 22-02-1993 | ||||
R1  Andrei ChesnokovA. Chesnokov | L | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
L. Pimek Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 San Marino - 27-07-1992 | ||||
R1  Mikael TillstromM. Tillstrom | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Stockholm - 21-10-1991 | ||||
R1 Aaron KricksteinA. Krickstein | L | 6-2 2-6 7-6(6) | ||
 Toulouse - 30-09-1991 | ||||
R1 Thomas EnqvistT. Enqvist | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Prague - 05-08-1991 | ||||
R2  Arnaud BoetschA. Boetsch | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1  Pedro RebolledoP. Rebolledo | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
D. Pate vs L. Pimek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.85% (195/174) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.32% (158/144) |
| 51.39% (480/454) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.86% (364/366) |
| 50.49% (4648/4558) | Games Win/Loss | 49.66% (3323/3368) |
| 55.41% (123/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.22% (42/40) |
| 26.32% (5/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.25% (99/77) |
| 50.70% (36/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.48% (17/25) |
| 54.39% (31/26) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 306.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.17 |
| 38.10% (16/26) | Slam W/L | 26.32% (5/14) |
| 40.63% (13/19) | Masters W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 55.27% (152/123) | Main Tour W/L | 54.15% (111/94) |
| 70.00% (14/6) | Challenger W/L | 58.18% (32/23) |
| 55% (178/322) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (149/274) |
| 36% (17/47) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (9/26) |
| 36% (5/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (67/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (56/90) |
| 83% (197/163) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (148/129) |
| 17% (197/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (148/18) |
| 19% (172/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (154/30) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:00 AM 13/11/25
Prediction
C. E. OverbeckqL. VithoontienqW1
1.2
W2
3.94
07:30 PM 12/11/25
Prediction
J. BoulaisT. MccormickW1
1.53
W2
2.31
07:55 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
H. BartonR. Sakamoto6W1
1.85
W2
1.83
04:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionB. SheltonF. A. AliassimeW1
1.76
W2
2.12
06:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionK. PolingqD. ChanWCW1
2.4
W2
1.49
04:00 AM 13/11/25
Prediction
M. HueslerY. Nishioka2W1
2.4
W2
1.49
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Taylor FritzAlex De Minaur12:00
H2H 5-5
Jannik Sinner
Alexander Zverev22:30
H2H 5-4
Jannik SinnerBen SheltonH2H 7-1
Carlos AlcarazLorenzo Musetti13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal