Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Nalbandian vs Ruben Bemelmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nalbandian vs Bemelmans analysis and find out who is favored!
David Nalbandian vs Ruben Bemelmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nalbandian has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bemelmans has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nalbandian, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bemelmans has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nalbandian has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bemelmans has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nalbandian has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bemelmans winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nalbandian has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 53/ 18), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 149/ 81). Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nalbandian winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nalbandian winning 2 and Bemelmans winning 0. The last match between Nalbandian and Bemelmans was at the AEGON Championships - London, 13-06-2012, Second, Grass with David Nalbandian getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nalbandian and Bemelmans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nalbandian winning 0 times and Bemelmans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nalbandian winning 0, and Bemelmans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nalbandian has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bemelmans has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nalbandian has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bemelmans has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nalbandian has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bemelmans has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nalbandian 1 - 0 Bemelmans
Ret.
Rank
3
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
67% (460-223)
Career Total W/L
57% (552-419)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,611,715
Career Prize Money
$1,013,488
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nalbandian VS Bemelmans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | David Nalbandian | Ruben Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:27 | 1:9:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (31/55) | 75% (38/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (23/31) | 58% (22/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (14/24) | 38% (5/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (24/51) | 33% (18/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Nalbandian VS Bemelmans H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
David Nalbandian
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Nalbandian | Ruben Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
David Nalbandian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
David Nalbandian
48%
(
42 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
84)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerzy Janowicz
Player
David Nalbandian
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
11
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
10
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Marcel Granollers
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aljaz Bedene
Player
David Nalbandian
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Ferrer
Player
David Nalbandian
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Carlos Berlocq
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
David Nalbandian
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Simone Bolelli
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
11
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Nicolas Almagro
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
5
Aces
28
6
Double Faults
4
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
30%
(
32 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
31 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Guido Pella
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nalbandian Vs Bemelmans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
