Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Jorda Sanchis vs Hazem Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sanchis vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
David Jorda Sanchis vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sanchis has won 48.59% of points on his second serve, while Naow has won 50.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sanchis, in recent form, has won 45.96% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 56.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.73% and 34.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sanchis has saved 64.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 61.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sanchis has won 50% of matches played (W/L 36/ 36), with Naow winning 68.67% (W/L 57/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sanchis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 163/ 117), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 15/ 25). Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 54/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Sanchis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 22/ 26), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 40/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sanchis winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sanchis winning 2 and Naow winning 1. The last match between Sanchis and Naow was at the M15 Valldoreix, 13-05-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with David Jorda Sanchis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sanchis and Naow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sanchis winning 1 times and Naow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sanchis winning 1, and Naow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sanchis has played against opponents with an average rank of 327.25 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 179.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sanchis has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sanchis has converted 47.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 44.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sanchis 1 - 0 Naow
297
Rank
297
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
341
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
56% (267-212)
Career Total W/L
66% (151-78)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
76% (26-8)
$10,165
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Jorda Sanchis | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:50:0 | 2:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (52/95) | 72% (78/109) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (31/52) | 58% (45/78) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (19/43) | 29% (9/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 64% (7/11) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (55/109) | 47% (45/95) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) |
Stats 
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Hazem Naow
55%
(
52 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Jorda Sanchis | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (10/14) | 76% (26/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (26/32) | 70% (54/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (290/277) | 57% (407/308) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 78% (7/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 17% (1/5) | 76% (19/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.51 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 141 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 123 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:2 | 1:38:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 327.71 | 229.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1169/1875) | 63% (1484/2347) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (842/1169) | 70% (1043/1484) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (336/706) | 50% (429/863) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (62/135) | 44% (119/273) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (624/1734) | 43% (999/2323) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (8/10) | 78% (14/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (12/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (10/24) | 76% (26/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 23% (3/13) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 100% (22/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 0% (22/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 33% (12/4) |
David Jorda Sanchis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Jaime Faria
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
7 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
11
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
62%
(
78 of
126)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
50 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
121
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Oriol Font
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
22 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
4
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
47 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sanchis Vs Naow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
