Dasha Ivanova vs Gaeul Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Ivanova vs G. Jang

Dasha Ivanova
USA
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
29
Age
19
-
Height
-
658
C. Rank
739
450
Best Rank
730
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Gaeul Jang
KOR
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
29
Age
19
-
Height
-
658
C. Rank
739
450
Best Rank
730
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Ivanova 2 - 0 Jang
They have played 4 sets in total, with Dasha Ivanova winning 4 and Gaeul Jang winning 0. The last match between Dasha Ivanova and Gaeul Jang was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 06-11-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Dasha Ivanova getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ivanova | 2 |
| Jang | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Sharm ElSheikh(11-06-24)
Dasha Ivanova
6
6
Gaeul Jang
4
2
(R1) W15 Yeongwol(09-06-23)
Dasha Ivanova
6
6
Gaeul Jang
2
1
D. Ivanova vs G. Jang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.22% (337-252) | Career Total W/L | 49.44% (44-45) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Ivanova vs G. Jang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dasha Ivanova has won 43.67% of points on their second serve, while Gaeul Jang has won 37.40%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dasha Ivanova, in recent form, has won 50.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gaeul Jang has won 45.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.43% and 36.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dasha Ivanova has saved 47.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaeul Jang has saved 45.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dasha Ivanova has won 60.34% of matches played (W/L 35/23), with Gaeul Jang winning 52.94% (W/L 27/24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dasha Ivanova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 214/132), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 101/100). Gaeul Jang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 44/43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Dasha Ivanova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/10), where as Gaeul Jang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Dasha Ivanova winning 2 times and Gaeul Jang being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Dasha Ivanova winning 4 and Gaeul Jang winning 0.
- The last match between Dasha Ivanova and Gaeul Jang was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 06-11-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Dasha Ivanova getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dasha Ivanova has played against opponents with an average rank of 351.41 while Gaeul Jang has played against players with an average rank of 449.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dasha Ivanova has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaeul Jang has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dasha Ivanova has converted 39.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaeul Jang has converted 42.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Dasha Ivanova vs Gaeul Jang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Ivanova vs G. Jang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:21:0 | Average Match Time | 1:21:0 |
| 71% (77/109) | 1st Serve % | 51% (56/110) |
| 66% (51/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (28/56) |
| 59% (19/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (22/54) |
| 73% (11/15) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
| 55% (60/110) | Return Points Win % | 36% (39/109) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ivanova 50%, Jang 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ivanova 55%, Jang 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Ivanova 56%, Jang 48%.
D. Ivanova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
G. Jang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||

D. Ivanova vs G. Jang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.22% (337/252) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.44% (44/45) |
| 55.81% (740/586) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (103/103) |
| 52.59% (6321/5699) | Games Win/Loss | 50.48% (952/934) |
| 61.85% (214/132) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.57% (44/43) |
| 50.25% (101/100) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.38% (22/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 945 | Aces Total | 144 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1494 | Total Double Faults | 263 |
| 1:13:58 | Average Match Time | 1:35:9 |
| 522.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.07 |
| 63% (19112/30511) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3232/5538) |
| 61% (11672/19112) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1956/3232) |
| 45% (5156/11398) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (996/2306) |
| 49% (1988/4027) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (340/728) |
| 47% (14492/30738) | Return Points Win % | 46% (2628/5653) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 47.70% (83/91) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 61.35% (254/160) | Futures W/L | 50.88% (29/28) |
| 57% (332/583) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (43/88) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (60/117) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 54% (82/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 92% (313/288) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (43/35) |
| 8% (313/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (43/8) |
| 18% (276/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (46/8) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction04:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction12:05 AM 15/11/25
Prediction02:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction01:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction01:05 AM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
02:00
H2H 0-1
00:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia