S. Lamens
To Win
M. Uchijima
To Win
Daria Saville vs Suzan Lamens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W L W L L
Form
L W L W W L W L W LHead-to-head: Saville 0 - 1 Lamens
They have played 3 sets in total, with Saville winning 1 and Lamens winning 2. The last match between Saville and Lamens was at the Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai, 14-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai(14-02-2025)
6
3
3
6
6
3
Upcoming Match
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Joint VS Errani PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Daria Saville
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
1
Sets Won
2
12
Games Won
15
1
Aces (Total)
2
11
Total Double Faults
6
2:26:48
Average Match Time
2:26:48
61% (53/87)
1st Serve %
58% (55/95)
62% (33/53)
1st Serve Win %
73% (40/55)
44% (15/34)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (18/40)
25% (3/12)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (4/9)
39% (37/95)
Return Points Win %
45% (39/87)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daria Saville vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Daria Saville 0 - 1 Suzan Lamens
Recent Second Serve Performance: In analyzing the recent form of both players over the past six months, it becomes apparent that Saville has displayed a second serve winning percentage of 39.82%, whereas Lamens has exhibited a higher proficiency with a percentage of 46.33%. It should be noted that a strong correlation has been observed between this specific statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Stats: When delving into the return game statistics of these players in recent matches, Saville has demonstrated a commendable ability by winning 55.85% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Lamens has impressively secured 54.45% of these points. In terms of first serve returns, the numbers stand at 41.42% and 40.17% for Saville and Lamens respectively. Such statistics assume significant importance when attempting to determine the favorite in this highly anticipated head-to-head encounter.
Analysis under Pressure: Examining the players' performance under pressure, it becomes evident that Saville has adeptly saved 52.03% of breakpoints during recent matches. Meanwhile, Lamens has proven slightly more resilient with a saving rate of 52.85%. This valuable statistic is particularly useful for those inclined towards in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Glancing at the players' records over the past year, Saville has emerged victorious in 53.06% of their matches played, boasting a win-loss ratio of 26/23. In contrast, Lamens has consistently displayed a higher level of success with a 63.29% win percentage and an impressive record of 50 wins to 29 losses. These statistics provide an encompassing glimpse into the head-to-head prediction overview.
Surface Proficiency: Considering the players' historical performances on various surfaces, it is noteworthy that Saville boasts a career win percentage of 57% on Hard courts, winning 187 out of 139 matches. However, their proficiency decreases on Grass courts, standing at a win percentage of 44% with 24 wins and 30 losses. On the other hand, Lamens has excelled on Clay, triumphing in 60% of matches played (182 wins out of 119), while struggling on Grass with a meager win percentage of 14% from 1 win and 6 losses.
Player Level: Over the past year, Saville has predominantly competed on the Main tour, achieving a 54.55% victory rate with 12 wins and 10 losses. In contrast, Lamens has primarily participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments exceeding $10,000 in prize money, impressively securing victory in 67.65% of matches, with 23 wins and 11 losses. When comparing the statistics between these players to determine the favorite, it is crucial to consider the respective event levels in which they have been competing.
Opponent Quality Analysis: In assessing the level of competition faced by these players over the past 12 months, Saville has regularly encountered opponents with an average rank of 175.18. Conversely, Lamens has confronted players with a slightly higher average rank of 223.47.
Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is enlightening to note that if this match extends to a deciding set, Saville has displayed prowess in such situations by emerging triumphant in 53% of deciding sets over the past year. In contrast, Lamens has proven even more adept in these circumstances, triumphing in 61% of all matches played on the professional tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past performances serve as a valuable tool in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to scrutinize the current event statistics of the players in question. This provides insight into their current form and in-favor player indication. To access such up-to-date information, please refer to the section below, detailing the players' performance thus far in this ongoing event. Furthermore, it should be noted that certain players often excel at specific events, making this a pivotal factor when making accurate outcome predictions.
Break Point Conversion: Assessing the ability of both players to convert break point opportunities, recent form indicates that Saville has capitalized on 45.18% of these chances, while Lamens has exhibited a higher success rate of 52.25%. This statistic carries great weight in providing valuable insights for in-game live betting tips whenever one of the players finds themselves facing a breakpoint opportunity.
For those with a keen interest in models predicting tennis matches, I recommend perusing this engaging article (Warning: Stats geeks only).
Daria Saville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Daria Saville
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Jil Teichmann
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Daria Saville
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
44%
(
11 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
56%
(
22 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
37
Total Points Won
49
|
1-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Marta Kostyuk
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Ellen Perez
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Daria Saville
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
50 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Shuai Zhang
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Daria Saville
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Anna Bondar
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
3
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Suzan Lamens
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (337/272)
Win/Loss
58% (295/215)
54% (769/650)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (654/513)
52% (6831/6415)
Games Win/Loss
53% (5623/4990)
57% (193/143)
Hard Win/Loss
55% (80/66)
54% (75/64)
Clay Win/Loss
60% (182/119)
56% (45/35)
Indoor Hard W/L
57% (32/24)
44% (24/30)
Grass Win/Loss
14% (1/6)
0.16
Aces Per Game
0.16
1014
Aces Total
831
0.37
Double Faults Per Game
0.47
2421
Total Double Faults
2407
1:21:6
Average Match Time
1:29:2
411.22
Average Opponent Rank
430.18
63% (21893/34529)
1st Serve %
59% (17865/30478)
62% (13670/21893)
1st Serve Win %
62% (11036/17865)
43% (5418/12633)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (5376/12614)
46% (1941/4184)
Break Points Won % (Total)
51% (2069/4064)
45% (15288/33986)
Return Points Win %
48% (14699/30569)
43% (29/39)
Slam W/L
25% (3/9)
56% (68/53)
Masters W/L
50% (4/4)
42% (5/7)
Cups W/L
69% (9/4)
55% (127/106)
Main Tour W/L
52% (24/22)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
61% (97/62)
Challenger W/L
62% (166/101)
69% (11/5)
Futures W/L
54% (89/75)
56% (333/599)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (292/506)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
52% (72/138)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
49% (47/95)
53% (112/210)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (83/149)
84% (327/276)
1st Set Won, Won Match
90% (270/244)
16% (327/51)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
10% (270/26)
21% (281/60)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (240/51)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Suzan Lamens
View full predicted draw for Lamens in Miami
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
