Prediction of Daria Saville [117th] vs Marta Kostyuk [25th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L L W L
Form
W L L W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Saville 1 - 2 Kostyuk
They have played 7 sets in total, with Saville winning 3 and Kostyuk winning 4. The last match between Saville and Kostyuk was at the Merida Open Akron - Merida, 25-02-2025, First, Hard with Daria Saville getting the victory 6-4 7-6(6).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daria Saville | 1 |
| Marta Kostyuk | 2 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Daria Saville
Player
Marta Kostyuk
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Daria Saville
63%
(
77 of
123)
1st Serve %
61%
(
71 of
117)
4
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
9
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
26%
(
12 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
48%
(
59 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
117)
122
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
| w/o | |||||
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Daria Saville
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
7
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 38 | Games Won | 40 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 32 |
| 2:15:33 | Average Match Time | 2:15:33 |
| 65% (166/257) | 1st Serve % | 63% (176/280) |
| 57% (94/166) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (112/176) |
| 40% (36/91) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (34/104) |
| 56% (19/34) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (19/43) |
| 48% (134/280) | Return Points Win % | 49% (127/257) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daria Saville vs Marta Kostyuk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Saville 1 - 2 Kostyuk
Editorial Prediction:
How crucial is second serve performance when forecasting the victor in a tennis match? Over the past six months, Daria Saville has secured 40.38% of her points on her second serve. In contrast, Marta Kostyuk has slightly outperformed her with a 43.02% success rate. This subtle statistic often aligns closely with match prediction accuracy, making it a vital part of the analysis script.
Next, delve into the realm of return game statistics. Saville has proven adept at seizing her opponent's second serve points, winning 56.54% recently, while Kostyuk achieves 54.47%. First serve return points reveal a narrow edge for Saville, claiming 41.27% compared to Kostyuk's 40.17%. Such metrics serve as a lens into who might hold the upper hand in this closely contested rivalry.
When the pressure mounts, saving breakpoints becomes paramount. Here, Kostyuk outshines, rescuing 56.98% of her breakpoints recently, against Saville's 53.8%. These figures add a layer of intrigue for those keen on in-game betting opportunities. Broadly speaking, over the past year, Saville clinched victory in 52.94% of her matches, while Kostyuk boasts a superior win rate of 60.38%, highlighting a consistent edge in overall performance.
The surface underfoot can change the game's dynamics entirely. Hard courts lay the foundation for Saville's best performances, winning 57% of her career matches there. On the other hand, grass incites trickiness for her, with only a 44% win rate. Kostyuk strides confidently on clay, boasting a 66% career win rate, though grass sees her win half of her encounters.
Level of play on the Main tour over the last year showcases Saville's competence with a 56.52% win rate, yet Kostyuk edges forward with 61.9%. Such figures must be tempered with reflections on events and opponents faced, as Saville's average competition rank sits at 187.35, distinctly lower than Kostyuk's 55.94. Prior head-to-head history pronounces Kostyuk's dominance, with two wins out of two clashes, wielding four sets to Saville's singular triumph. Their recent skirmish at Wimbledon extended into a battle with Kostyuk victorious, which hints how matches against each other tend to stretch into marquee events.
Breaking down deciding set performances, Kostyuk has proved herself yet again, winning 60% of these crucial moments, leaving Saville's 50% win rate slightly lacking in comparison. Interestingly, tiebreak confrontations have seen Kostyuk unbreachable, a fact that may weigh on the mind during tense junctures. Breakpoint conversion rates further illustrate Kostyuk's adept finesse, taking advantage of 48.37% of such chances, whereas Saville manages 44.22%. Confidence blossoms as she turns opportunities into tangible leads. With such information laid bare, predictions cast a hopeful light on Kostyuk to seize victory once more in this anticipated clash.
Daria Saville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Daria Saville
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Olivia Gadecki
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
4
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
12
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Daria Saville
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
33%
(
16 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
48%
(
51 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Daria Saville
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Jil Teichmann
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Daria Saville
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
44%
(
11 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
56%
(
22 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
37
Total Points Won
49
|
1-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Marta Kostyuk
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Marta Kostyuk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Marta Kostyuk
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
132%
(
70 of
53)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Marta Kostyuk
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Anna Blinkova
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Marta Kostyuk
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Caroline Dolehide
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Robin Montgomery
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Marta Kostyuk
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Marta Kostyuk
71%
(
91 of
129)
1st Serve %
57%
(
67 of
118)
0
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
10
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
50 of
67)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
49 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
118)
124
Total Points Won
123
|
5-7 7-6(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Katerina Siniakova
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (338/273) | Win/Loss | 62% (228/137) |
| 54% (772/653) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (505/350) |
| 52% (6860/6442) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4283/3673) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1023 | Aces Total | 1009 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.5 |
| 2443 | Total Double Faults | 1958 |
| 1:21:35 | Average Match Time | 1:35:25 |
| 413.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 266.43 |
| 63% (22045/34790) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15635/26131) |
| 62% (13766/22045) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10061/15611) |
| 43% (5455/12742) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (4608/10542) |
| 46% (1962/4238) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1589/3279) |
| 45% (15434/34289) | Return Points Win % | 46% (11852/25595) |
| 56% (334/601) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (227/362) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (72/138) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (49/85) |
| 53% (113/212) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (78/128) |
| 84% (328/276) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (216/189) |
| 16% (328/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (216/27) |
| 22% (282/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (149/39) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
