Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daria Lopatetskaya vs Katie Swan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lopatetskaya vs Swan analysis and find out who is favored!
Daria Lopatetskaya vs Katie Swan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lopatetskaya has won 41.88% of points on his second serve, while Swan has won 40.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lopatetskaya, in recent form, has won 59.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Swan has won 56.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.96% and 39.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lopatetskaya has saved 51.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Swan has saved 57.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lopatetskaya has won 61.76% of matches played (W/L 21/ 13), with Swan winning 50% (W/L 17/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lopatetskaya has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 33/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 54/ 40). Swan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 20/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 14/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Lopatetskaya has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9), where as Swan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.84% of matches (W/L 17/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lopatetskaya has played against opponents with an average rank of 156.94 while Swan has played against players with an average rank of 281.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lopatetskaya has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Swan has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lopatetskaya has converted 60% of breakpoint opportunities, and Swan has converted 45.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lopatetskaya 0 - 0 Swan
876
Rank
216
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
333
Rank
118
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
62% (114-69)
Career Total W/L
60% (201-132)
0% (0-2)
YTD W/L
44% (4-5)
$68,000
Career Prize Money
$221,866
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lopatetskaya VS Swan H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daria Lopatetskaya | Katie Swan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 44% (4/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 50% (10/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 10% (2/19) | 50% (89/90) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 19 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.46 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 176.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (9/14) | 61% (326/534) |
| 1st Serve W% | 11% (1/9) | 66% (215/326) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 20% (1/5) | 39% (81/208) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (36/85) |
| Return Pts W% | 27% (6/22) | 47% (293/630) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 44% (4/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Daria Lopatetskaya Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Alessia Popescu
Player
Daria Lopatetskaya
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
28
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andre Lukosiute
Player
Daria Lopatetskaya
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Iva Primorac
70%
(
88 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
114)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
59 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
114)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Lisa Zaar
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Julita Saner
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
55%
(
36 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Marie Weckerle
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
83
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stephanie Judith Visscher
Player
Daria Lopatetskaya
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 4-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Nina Vargova
79%
(
74 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
83 of
133)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
72 of
133)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Selina Atay
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
29 of
38)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Katie Swan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Melisa Ercan
Player
Katie Swan
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
14 of
18)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Katie Swan
81%
(
72 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Melisa Ercan
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Xiaodi You
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Katie Swan
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Katie Swan
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Katie Swan
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Katie Swan
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
43
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Lopatetskaya Vs Swan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
