Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daria Frayman vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Frayman vs Sawangkaew analysis and find out who is favored!
Daria Frayman vs Mananchaya Sawangkaew Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frayman has won 50.49% of points on his second serve, while Sawangkaew has won 45.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frayman, in recent form, has won 64.32% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sawangkaew has won 56.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.49% and 42.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Frayman has saved 54.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sawangkaew has saved 51.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Frayman has won 77.78% of matches played (W/L 28/ 8), with Sawangkaew winning 70.31% (W/L 45/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Frayman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 28/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Sawangkaew has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 136/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Frayman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 24/ 6), where as Sawangkaew has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.31% of matches (W/L 45/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frayman has played against opponents with an average rank of 135 while Sawangkaew has played against players with an average rank of 351.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frayman has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sawangkaew has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Frayman has converted 47.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sawangkaew has converted 47.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Frayman 0 - 0 Sawangkaew
752
Rank
752
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
223
Rank
223
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
71% (32-13)
Career Total W/L
68% (136-64)
61% (11-7)
YTD W/L
71% (17-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Frayman VS Sawangkaew H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daria Frayman | Mananchaya Sawangkaew |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | 71% (17/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (22/15) | 62% (36/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (174/135) | 55% (301/249) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 71% (17/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 82 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:43 | 1:47:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.06 | 304.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 79% (772/978) | 62% (1059/1700) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (449/772) | 66% (698/1059) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (104/206) | 45% (290/641) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (75/158) | 47% (106/224) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (552/1109) | 47% (838/1796) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 71% (17/7) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 71% (17/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 80% (8/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 50% (10/5) |
Daria Frayman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Daria Frayman
77%
(
74 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Wozuko Mdlulwa
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Daria Frayman
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
80%
(
64 of
80)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
51%
(
50 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
80)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Yujin Ahn
87%
(
68 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Yujin Kim
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
100%
(
4 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Yoana Moneva
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve %
36%
(
12 of
33)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Daria Frayman
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
83%
(
40 of
48)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Mariam Atia
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Isabelle Lacy
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Daria Frayman
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mananchaya Sawangkaew Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Aoi Ito
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Miho Kuramochi
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
58 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
62 of
117)
121
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Hikaru Sato
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
76%
(
85 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
51 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Maegan Manasse
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Naho Sato
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
83 of
112)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
112)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Su Jeong Jang
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
11
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Frayman Vs Sawangkaew Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
