Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Darcy Parke vs Saumya Vig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Parke vs Vig analysis and find out who is favored!
Darcy Parke vs Saumya Vig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Parke has won 22.73% of points on his second serve, while Vig has won 42.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Parke, in recent form, has won 40% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vig has won 52.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.33% and 34.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Parke has saved 28.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vig has saved 48.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Parke has won 22.22% of matches played (W/L 2/ 7), with Vig winning 40% (W/L 16/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Parke has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 19% (W/L 5/ 21). Vig has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 30% (W/L 43/ 100), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Parke has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 16.67% of matches (W/L 1/ 5), where as Vig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Parke winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Parke winning 2 and Vig winning 1. The last match between Parke and Vig was at the W15 Catez Ob Savi, 29-05-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Darcy Parke getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Parke and Vig have played a deciding set 1 times, with Parke winning 1 times and Vig 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Parke winning 0, and Vig 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Parke has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Vig has played against players with an average rank of 89.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Parke has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vig has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Parke has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vig has converted 39.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Parke 1 - 0 Vig
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
24% (11-34)
Career Total W/L
30% (63-150)
17% (1-5)
YTD W/L
33% (3-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Darcy Parke | Saumya Vig |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 20 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (45/61) | 78% (46/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (26/45) | 50% (23/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (8/16) | 38% (5/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (31/59) | 44% (27/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 11-9 |
Stats 
Darcy Parke
Player
Saumya Vig
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
78%
(
46 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Darcy Parke | Saumya Vig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 17% (1/5) | 33% (3/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 23% (3/10) | 32% (7/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 36% (38/69) | 42% (98/133) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 29% (2/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.08 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 168 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (25/47) | 55% (330/595) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (15/25) | 54% (177/330) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 23% (5/22) | 43% (113/265) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/4) | 40% (22/55) |
| Return Pts W% | 30% (15/50) | 43% (226/531) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (1/6) | 33% (3/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Darcy Parke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Darcy Parke
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cassidy Mataia
Player
Darcy Parke
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(2) 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaylah Mcphee
Player
Darcy Parke
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Saumya Vig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Yashina
Player
Saumya Vig
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Abhaya Vemuri
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Saumya Vig
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Anastasiia Sergienko
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
85)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
13
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
43 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 5-7 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vaishnavi Adkar
Player
Saumya Vig
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Sachi Sharma
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-4 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pooja Ingale
Player
Saumya Vig
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
85)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yukina Saigo
Player
Saumya Vig
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
46%
(
40 of
87)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
11
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Saumya Vig
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Gurmanat Kaur Sandhu
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Parke Vs Vig Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
