D. Medvedev
To Win
C. Norrie
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W LForm
W W W L W L W L W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Medvedev winning 2 and Cerundolo winning 0. The last match between Medvedev and Cerundolo was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 27-04-2025, Round: Third, Surface: Clay, with Daniil Medvedev getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Daniil Medvedev | 1 |
Juan Manuel Cerundolo | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(27-04-2025)
Medvedev | Stats | Cerundolo |
---|---|---|
64% (18-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (25-15) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
11 | Ranking | 109 |
1 | Highest Rank | 79 |
29 | Age | 23 |
R | Plays | L |
25 | Titles | 14 |
71% (555-230) | Career Total W/L | 62% (272-168) |
$31,921,765 | Career Prize Money | $448,595 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
- / First
French Open - Paris atp
22 May 2025 / Q3
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:3:0 | Average Match Time | 1:3:0 |
64% (29/45) | 1st Serve % | 55% (23/42) |
76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (11/23) |
69% (11/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
52% (22/42) | Return Points Win % | 27% (12/45) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing recent second serve performance, Medvedev has secured 42.96% of points on his second serve over the last six months, while Cerundolo has attained 46.13%. This statistic plays a significant role in predicting match outcomes. Furthermore, return game statistics reveal a competitive edge for Cerundolo, who has won 47.61% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Medvedev's 46.72% in recent form.
Medvedev's first serve return success rate is 26.09%, whereas Cerundolo outshines him slightly with 29.63%. This higher correlation to match prediction can influence who might be favored in the matchup. When under pressure, Medvedev has effectively saved 55.41% of breakpoints, while Cerundolo's breakpoint save rate is at 53.39%, offering insights for in-game betting strategies.
Assessing overall performance, Medvedev has achieved a match win rate of 62.5% (W/L 40/24) over the past year compared to Cerundolo's 67.06% (W/L 57/28). This provides a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head meeting. Their preferences for court surfaces further differentiate them. Medvedev excels on Hard courts with a 75% win rate (W/L 256/84), but his performance declines on Clay at 65% (W/L 90/49). Conversely, Cerundolo's top surface is Clay with a 65% win rate (W/L 259/142), whereas he struggles on Indoor Hard courts with no wins (W/L 0/4).
In terms of player level, Medvedev has predominantly competed in Masters series, securing 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/9), while Cerundolo has focused on the Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving a win rate of 68.25% (W/L 43/20). While factoring the quality of opponents, Medvedev has faced players with an average rank of 51.78, in contrast with Cerundolo's opponents who average a rank of 209.54.
Medvedev has emerged victorious in 56% of deciding sets over the last year, whereas Cerundolo boasts a 67% success rate in such scenarios across tour matches. Their conversion rates of breakpoint opportunities also showcase Cerundolo's superiority, with a conversion rate of 39.82% compared to Medvedev's 33.11%. These factors collectively suggest Cerundolo may hold the upper hand based on the current statistics.
Medvedev vs Cerundolo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Daniil Medvedev
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alexei Popyrin
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Cameron Norrie
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Casper Ruud
Player
Daniil Medvedev
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
7
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Alex De Minaur
Player
Daniil Medvedev
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Cina
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
18 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
71% (555/230) | Win/Loss | 62% (272/168) |
66% (1298/664) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (604/416) |
56% (10425/8304) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4966/4436) |
75% (256/84) | Hard Win/Loss | 36% (9/16) |
65% (94/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (263/145) |
68% (149/71) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) |
70% (56/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
5186 | Aces Total | 670 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
2481 | Total Double Faults | 972 |
1:33:25 | Average Match Time | 1:39:6 |
323.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 326.1 |
61% (31841/52306) | 1st Serve % | 67% (19291/28860) |
75% (23824/31841) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12114/19291) |
51% (10434/20458) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4778/9568) |
43% (2339/5404) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1537/3291) |
40% (21605/54041) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12646/29268) |
74% (91/32) | Slam W/L | 42% (8/11) |
68% (118/56) | Masters W/L | 63% (10/6) |
77% (20/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
72% (180/70) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (34/32) |
52% (12/11) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
69% (55/25) | Challenger W/L | 65% (146/80) |
73% (74/28) | Futures W/L | 65% (74/39) |
71% (462/653) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (267/418) |
72% (88/123) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 18% (3/17) |
57% (159/278) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (77/114) |
63% (138/220) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (76/125) |
91% (506/461) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (263/231) |
9% (506/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (263/31) |
33% (278/93) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (177/41) |