Daniil Glinka vs Marwan Haida-Lamrani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance: Haida-Lamrani has a recent second serve point win rate of 41.77%, compared to Glinka's 48.52%. Can second serve prowess indicate a potential favorite? Likely yes, giving Glinka an edge.
• Return game statistics: Haida-Lamrani wins 31.25% of opponent's second serve points versus Glinka's 44.28%. For first serve return points, Haida-Lamrani is at 23.08%, while Glinka is 26.15%. Does this suggest an advantage in return games? Glinka seems to have a stronger return game.
• Performance under pressure: Haida-Lamrani saves 50% of breakpoints, slightly less than Glinka's 51.5%. Is there much between them in clutch scenarios? Not significantly.
• Match performance overview: Over the past year, Haida-Lamrani has a match win rate of 42.86%, while Glinka boasts 65%. How consistent are both players? Glinka appears to be in better form.
• Surface preferences: Haida-Lamrani’s best surface is indoor hard with a 43% win rate, compared to Glinka’s 57%. Does Glinka lead on key surfaces? Yes, especially on indoor hard.
• Player level engagement: Both play primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with Haida-Lamrani winning 42.86% and Glinka 65.63%. Does experience at these levels translate to wins? Glinka is more successful here.
• Opponent quality stats: Haida-Lamrani competes against higher-ranked players, with an average rank of 123.86, compared to Glinka's 440.72. Could this impact match outcomes? It may suggest Haida-Lamrani faces tougher competition.
• Deciding set performance: With a 100% deciding set win rate, Haida-Lamrani excels in crucial situations, compared to Glinka's 57%. Will this be pivotal? Potentially if the match extends.
• Break point conversion: Haida-Lamrani converts 25% of breakpoints, slightly less than Glinka's 28.34%. Will this influence match momentum? It favors Glinka marginally.

Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):

In assessing the upcoming match between Haida-Lamrani and Glinka, several performance metrics stand out. Glinka clearly demonstrates stronger second serve and return game statistics which are generally highly correlated with match success. Additionally, Glinka's recent match performance and higher winning rate on favored surfaces place him in a better position.

While Haida-Lamrani showcases excellent deciding set performance, this may not offset Glinka’s overall form and statistical advantages. Both players have experience in the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuit, but Glinka has managed to convert that into a higher percentage of match wins.

Considering these factors, Glinka is positioned as the likely winner in the upcoming match, given his robust performance trends and solid statistical advantage. However, Haida-Lamrani’s ability to clinch deciding sets could introduce an element of surprise if the match becomes tightly contested.