search

Daniil Glinka vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Glinka vs Wong analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Daniil Glinka vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Glinka has won 53.37% of points on his second serve, while Wong has won 51.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Glinka, in recent form, has won 54.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wong has won 49.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.25% and 29.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Glinka has saved 70% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wong has saved 66.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Glinka has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 50/ 30), with Wong winning 65% (W/L 52/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Glinka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 47/ 38), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 26/ 28). Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 75/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
  • Player level: In the last year, Glinka has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 42/ 22), where as Wong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.34% of matches (W/L 34/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Glinka winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Glinka winning 2 and Wong winning 1. The last match between Glinka and Wong was at the M15 Monastir, 06-08-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniil Glinka getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Glinka and Wong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Glinka winning 1 times and Wong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Glinka winning 0, and Wong 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Glinka has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.79 while Wong has played against players with an average rank of 208.09.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Glinka has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wong has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Glinka has converted 39.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wong has converted 34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Glinka 1 - 0 Wong

Daniil Glinka

1

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

1

Minor

461

Rank

461

High

23

Age

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

212

Rank

212

High

19

Age

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

2

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L L W W W L W W W L

Form

W L W L L W W W L L

52% (154-140)

Career Total W/L

58% (96-70)

58% (14-10)

YTD W/L

45% (5-6)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Glinka VS Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Daniil Glinka Chak Lam Coleman Wong
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 1
Games Won 17 13
Aces (Total) 14 6
DFs (Total) 6 8
Avg Match Time 2:9:0 2:9:0
1st Serve % 58% (51/88) 59% (54/92)
1st Serve Win% 78% (40/51) 78% (42/54)
2nd Serve Win% 59% (22/37) 45% (17/38)
BPs Won% (Total) 50% (3/6) 20% (1/5)
Return Points W% 36% (33/92) 30% (26/88)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set L, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)

Glinka VS Wong H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
4-6 7-5 6-2
cross
Daniil Glinka
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58% ( 51 of 88)
1st Serve %
59% ( 54 of 92)
14
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
78% ( 40 of 51)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 42 of 54)
59% ( 22 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 17 of 38)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
30% ( 26 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 33 of 92)
95
Total Points Won
85

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Daniil Glinka Chak Lam Coleman Wong
YTD W/L 58% (14/10) 45% (5/6)
Sets Win/Loss 61% (34/22) 50% (13/13)
Games Win/Loss 54% (293/251) 48% (131/141)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 50% (5/5)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 58% (14/10) 0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.52 0.6
Aces Total 139 81
DFs per game 0.22 0.23
DFs Total 59 31
Avg Match Time 1:43:49 1:54:44
Avg Opp Rank 165.92 328.45
1st Serve % 61% (1017/1673) 54% (476/876)
1st Serve W% 75% (763/1017) 74% (354/476)
2nd Serve W% 52% (338/656) 51% (205/400)
BPs Won% Total 38% (65/173) 29% (18/63)
Return Pts W% 38% (686/1791) 35% (310/889)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 40% (2/3) 50% (5/5)
Futures W/L 63% (12/7) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 58% (14/24) 45% (5/11)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 17% (1/6) 83% (5/6)
Deciding Set W% 25% (2/8) 25% (1/4)
1st set W, W 72% (18/13) 71% (7/5)
1st set W, L 28% (18/5) 29% (7/2)
1st set L, W 17% (6/1) 0% (4/0)

Daniil Glinka Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
SF
cross
Antoine Hoang
Player
Daniil Glinka
73% ( 55 of 75)
1st Serve %
60% ( 42 of 70)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
75% ( 41 of 55)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 32 of 42)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 13 of 28)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 24 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 25 of 70)
76
Total Points Won
69
L
7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Daniil Glinka
Player
Aidan Mchugh
68% ( 36 of 53)
1st Serve %
59% ( 33 of 56)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
89% ( 32 of 36)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 23 of 33)
53% ( 9 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
23% ( 12 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 22 of 56)
63
Total Points Won
46
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Daniil Glinka
Player
Yannik Steinegger
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve %
62% ( 40 of 65)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
90% ( 28 of 31)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 25 of 40)
53% ( 10 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
24% ( 12 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 28 of 65)
66
Total Points Won
49
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alexis Canter
65% ( 36 of 55)
1st Serve %
64% ( 36 of 56)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
81% ( 29 of 36)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 26 of 36)
68% ( 13 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 9 of 20)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 13 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 21 of 56)
63
Total Points Won
48
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Fabien Salle
Player
Daniil Glinka
68% ( 73 of 107)
1st Serve %
57% ( 49 of 86)
12
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
3
79% ( 58 of 73)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 34 of 49)
38% ( 13 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
34% ( 36 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 31 of 86)
102
Total Points Won
91
L
5-7 6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Daniil Glinka
Player
Hamish Stewart
71% ( 57 of 80)
1st Serve %
63% ( 48 of 76)
5
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
1
68% ( 39 of 57)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 32 of 48)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
35% ( 28 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 29 of 76)
81
Total Points Won
75
W
6-3 7-6(5) H2H
R2
cross
Daniil Glinka
Player
Marcus Walters
51% ( 22 of 43)
1st Serve %
61% ( 34 of 56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
82% ( 18 of 22)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 21 of 34)
90% ( 19 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
14% ( 6 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 25 of 56)
62
Total Points Won
37
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Daniil Glinka
Player
Mikail Alimli
60% ( 30 of 50)
1st Serve %
49% ( 34 of 70)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
87% ( 26 of 30)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 25 of 34)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 14 of 36)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
20% ( 10 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 31 of 70)
71
Total Points Won
49
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Oscar Otte
Player
Daniil Glinka
71% ( 55 of 77)
1st Serve %
66% ( 64 of 97)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
80% ( 44 of 55)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 46 of 64)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 15 of 33)
10% ( 1 of 10)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
27% ( 21 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 36 of 97)
92
Total Points Won
82
L
7-6(5) 7-6(3) H2H
SF
cross
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Daniil Glinka
67% ( 64 of 95)
1st Serve %
64% ( 86 of 135)
13
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
80% ( 51 of 64)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 63 of 86)
58% ( 18 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 22 of 49)
7% ( 1 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
27% ( 26 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 50 of 135)
119
Total Points Won
111
L
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 H2H

Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Jan Choinski
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60% ( 43 of 72)
1st Serve %
48% ( 43 of 90)
9
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
5
81% ( 35 of 43)
1st Serve Won
84% ( 36 of 43)
55% ( 16 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 21 of 47)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
29% ( 21 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 33 of 90)
84
Total Points Won
78
L
3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
F
cross
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68% ( 48 of 71)
1st Serve %
46% ( 24 of 52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67% ( 32 of 48)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 17 of 24)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 14 of 28)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
37% ( 26 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 21 of 52)
66
Total Points Won
57
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
SF
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Yuta Shimizu
57% ( 50 of 87)
1st Serve %
53% ( 47 of 89)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 32 of 47)
70% ( 26 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 24 of 42)
11% ( 1 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 10)
34% ( 30 of 87)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 33 of 89)
90
Total Points Won
86
W
7-6(5) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
51% ( 33 of 65)
1st Serve %
59% ( 40 of 68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
79% ( 26 of 33)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 31 of 40)
69% ( 22 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
26% ( 17 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 26 of 68)
74
Total Points Won
59
W
7-6(10) 6-3 H2H
R2
W
w/o H2H
R1
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
49% ( 52 of 107)
1st Serve %
51% ( 63 of 123)
13
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
75% ( 39 of 52)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 39 of 63)
45% ( 25 of 55)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 27 of 60)
33% ( 5 of 15)
Break Points Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
40% ( 43 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 57 of 123)
121
Total Points Won
109
W
6-4 4-6 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Felix Gill
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68% ( 67 of 99)
1st Serve %
60% ( 48 of 80)
6
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
1
76% ( 51 of 67)
1st Serve Won
85% ( 41 of 48)
59% ( 19 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 16 of 32)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
29% ( 29 of 99)
Rtn Points Won
29% ( 23 of 80)
93
Total Points Won
86
L
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71% ( 59 of 83)
1st Serve %
61% ( 42 of 69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
73% ( 43 of 59)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 24 of 42)
42% ( 10 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
10% ( 1 of 10)
36% ( 30 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 34 of 69)
87
Total Points Won
65
L
6-2 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Raphael Collignon
58% ( 37 of 64)
1st Serve %
61% ( 42 of 69)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76% ( 28 of 37)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 26 of 42)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 16 of 27)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
30% ( 19 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 27 of 69)
72
Total Points Won
61
W
6-4 7-6(4) H2H
R2
cross
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60% ( 56 of 93)
1st Serve %
50% ( 50 of 101)
12
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
77% ( 43 of 56)
1st Serve Won
82% ( 41 of 50)
70% ( 26 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 22 of 51)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
26% ( 24 of 93)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 38 of 101)
107
Total Points Won
87
L
6-7(6) 6-1 6-4 H2H

Glinka Vs Wong Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions