Danielle Rose Collins vs Jodie Anna Burrage Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W L L
Form
L W L L L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Collins 1 - 0 Burrage
They have played 2 sets in total, with Collins winning 2 and Burrage winning 0. The last match between Collins and Burrage was at the French Open - Paris, 26-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Danielle Rose Collins getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Danielle Rose Collins | 1 |
| Jodie Anna Burrage | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(26-05-2025)
Danielle Rose Collins
Jodie Anna Burrage
7
6
6
4
| Collins | Stats | Burrage |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (12-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 31% (8-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 53 | Ranking | 162 |
| 7 | Highest Rank | 85 |
| 31 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 6 |
| 63% (286-167) | Career Total W/L | 58% (259-188) |
| $8,867,802 | Career Prize Money | $547,451 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rublev VS Etcheverry PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shapovalov VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-4 |
Stats 
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:40:0 | Average Match Time | 1:40:0 |
| 54% (39/72) | 1st Serve % | 55% (41/74) |
| 74% (29/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (29/41) |
| 45% (15/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (10/33) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 47% (35/74) | Return Points Win % | 39% (28/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Collins vs Burrage Match Preview :
- Over the past six months, Burrage has slightly edged Collins in second serve performance, winning 43.12% compared to Collins' 42.25%. Could this small difference give Burrage an advantage?
- In return games, Burrage also holds a slight edge, winning 50.06% of opponents' second serve points compared to Collins' 48.39%. However, Collins has a marginal lead on first serve returns at 28.51% versus Burrage's 27.39%.
- When it comes to saving breakpoints, Burrage shows robustness with a 54.17% save rate, surpassing Collins' 52.94%.
- In terms of match win percentage over the last year, Collins has a slight advantage at 56.25% compared to Burrage’s 55.1%.
- Considering surface performance, Collins excels on clay with a 68% win rate, while Burrage performs best on indoor hard courts with a 62% win rate.
- Collins has faced tougher opponents over the past year, with opponents ranked at an average of 59.41, while Burrage's opponents had an average rank of 235.88.
- When it comes to deciding sets, Collins shows considerable tenacity, winning 64% as opposed to Burrage's 42%.
- Collins demonstrates better breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 33.63% of opportunities compared to Burrage’s 28.66%.
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
As Collins and Burrage prepare to face off, several key statistics highlight the strengths and possible advantages of each player. Burrage slightly outperforms Collins in second serve performance and return games, which could be pivotal. However, Collins' experience facing higher-ranked opponents and superior performance in critical situations such as deciding sets and breakpoint conversions may provide her with the edge.
While Burrage has shown resilience, particularly in saving breakpoints, Collins’ consistent performance under pressure, coupled with her extensive experience at higher competition levels, suggests she may handle crucial moments more adeptly.
Considering these factors and Collins' proven ability to win against stiffer competition, she is likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming match.
Collins vs Burrage Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Danielle Rose Collins Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Danielle Rose Collins
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
43%
(
31 of
72)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Danielle Rose Collins
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Danielle Rose Collins
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Emma Raducanu
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
97
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Sofia Kenin
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
9
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Danielle Rose Collins
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jodie Anna Burrage Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
12
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
9
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
69)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Jana Fett
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
42%
(
10 of
24)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
39
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (286/167) | Win/Loss | 58% (259/188) |
| 60% (626/412) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (591/420) |
| 54% (5088/4393) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4998/4343) |
| 62% (174/106) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (160/102) |
| 68% (91/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (7/16) |
| 65% (11/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (72/43) |
| 45% (10/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 43% (20/27) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1290 | Aces Total | 1678 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1644 | Total Double Faults | 1499 |
| 1:28:28 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 322.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.11 |
| 58% (16113/27960) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16443/27954) |
| 66% (10605/16113) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11012/16443) |
| 47% (5577/11839) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5317/11511) |
| 48% (1580/3271) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1568/3370) |
| 45% (12117/27203) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12493/28098) |
| 57% (44/33) | Slam W/L | 33% (6/12) |
| 63% (63/37) | Masters W/L | 22% (2/7) |
| 78% (7/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 62% (82/51) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (29/37) |
| 66% (80/42) | Challenger W/L | 62% (168/105) |
| 83% (10/2) | Futures W/L | 68% (54/26) |
| 64% (280/439) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (255/439) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 59% (58/99) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (53/102) |
| 59% (85/144) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (48/124) |
| 86% (281/242) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (284/231) |
| 14% (281/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (284/51) |
| 25% (172/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (163/27) |
Collins vs. Burrage Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
