Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniele Capecchi vs Nicolae Frunza Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Capecchi vs Frunza analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniele Capecchi vs Nicolae Frunza Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Capecchi has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Frunza has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Capecchi, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Frunza has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Capecchi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Frunza has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Capecchi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Frunza winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Capecchi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 66/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Frunza has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 192/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Capecchi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Frunza has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Capecchi winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Capecchi winning 2 and Frunza winning 0. The last match between Capecchi and Frunza was at the San Benedetto Challenger, 16-07-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Daniele Capecchi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Capecchi and Frunza have played a deciding set 0 times, with Capecchi winning 0 times and Frunza 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Capecchi winning 0, and Frunza 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Capecchi has played against opponents with an average rank of 275 while Frunza has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Capecchi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Frunza has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Capecchi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Frunza has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Capecchi 1 - 0 Frunza
760
Rank
473
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
883
Rank
442
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
56% (268-209)
Career Total W/L
63% (217-129)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniele Capecchi | Nicolae Frunza |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:49 | 1:19:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (45/61) | 65% (41/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (30/45) | 54% (22/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (34/63) | 36% (22/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniele Capecchi | Nicolae Frunza |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniele Capecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Daniele Capecchi
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Daniele Capecchi
66%
(
80 of
121)
1st Serve %
62%
(
83 of
133)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
57 of
83)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
59 of
133)
131
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Moundir
Player
Daniele Capecchi
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Daniele Capecchi
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
122)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
51 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
62 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Johannes Haerteis
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Daniele Capecchi
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Dusan Obradovic
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
50 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Bor Artnak
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
43%
(
44 of
102)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
23%
(
6 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Daniele Capecchi
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Michele Ribecai
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolae Frunza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yassine Dlimi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Nicolae Frunza
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Yanaki Milev
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
103)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
15
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Nicolae Frunza
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
46 of
97)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Nikola Kolyachev
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandr Bielinskyi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Capecchi Vs Frunza Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
