Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniela Vismane vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vismane vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniela Vismane vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vismane has won 44.78% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 44.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vismane, in recent form, has won 54.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.71% and 37.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vismane has saved 53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 54.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vismane has won 54.84% of matches played (W/L 34/ 28), with Hibino winning 54.41% (W/L 37/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vismane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 27/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Vismane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.92% of matches (W/L 27/ 25), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vismane winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vismane winning 0 and Hibino winning 2. The last match between Vismane and Hibino was at the Chennai Open - Chennai, 11-09-2022, Q3, Hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vismane and Hibino have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vismane winning 0 times and Hibino 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vismane winning 0, and Hibino 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vismane has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.65 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 197.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vismane has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vismane has converted 48.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 48.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vismane 0 - 1 Hibino
371
Rank
228
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
62% (230-143)
Career Total W/L
56% (368-293)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
56% (14-11)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniela Vismane | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:16 | 1:20:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 81% (42/52) | 73% (45/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 45% (19/42) | 60% (27/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (4/10) | 65% (11/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 86% (6/7) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (24/62) | 56% (29/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Daniela Vismane
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniela Vismane | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 56% (14/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (25/27) | 51% (32/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (237/245) | 51% (290/274) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:15 | 1:45:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.22 | 146.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (1103/1518) | 67% (1239/1842) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (600/1103) | 63% (778/1239) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (191/415) | 46% (276/603) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (105/216) | 47% (102/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (762/1588) | 44% (815/1869) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (6/8) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 38% (13/5) |
Daniela Vismane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Daniela Vismane
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
81%
(
62 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Daniela Vismane
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Daniela Vismane
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Lea Boskovic
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Daniela Vismane
35%
(
19 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Maria Toma
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
2
Total Points Won
4
|
0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vismane Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nao Hibino
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
