Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniela Vismane vs Lena Rueffer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vismane vs Rueffer analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniela Vismane vs Lena Rueffer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vismane has won 45.66% of points on his second serve, while Rueffer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vismane, in recent form, has won 54.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rueffer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.88% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vismane has saved 53.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rueffer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vismane has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 35/ 28), with Rueffer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vismane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 27/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Rueffer has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Vismane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.83% of matches (W/L 28/ 25), where as Rueffer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vismane has played against opponents with an average rank of 321.86 while Rueffer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vismane has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rueffer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vismane has converted 47.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rueffer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vismane 0 - 0 Rueffer
371
Rank
228
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
62% (230-142)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniela Vismane | Lena Rueffer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (25/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (228/232) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:38 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 232.77 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1041/1441) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (567/1041) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (189/400) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (100/209) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (739/1534) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniela Vismane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Simona Waltert
Player
Daniela Vismane
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Daniela Vismane
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Lea Boskovic
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Daniela Vismane
35%
(
19 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Maria Toma
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
2
Total Points Won
4
|
0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Alice Rame
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
65
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Lena Rueffer Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Vismane Vs Rueffer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
