Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Evans vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Evans vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Evans vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evans has won 51.47% of points on his second serve, while Nakashima has won 56.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evans, in recent form, has won 49.62% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 49.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.3% and 31.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evans has saved 60.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 71.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evans has won 35% of matches played (W/L 14/ 26), with Nakashima winning 58.67% (W/L 44/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 45/ 51). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 35% of matches (W/L 7/ 13), where as Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Evans winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Evans winning 2 and Nakashima winning 5. The last match between Evans and Nakashima was at the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona, 15-04-2024, First, Clay with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Evans and Nakashima have played a deciding set 1 times, with Evans winning 1 times and Nakashima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Evans winning 0, and Nakashima 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 128.88 while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 233.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evans has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evans has converted 29.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 35.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Evans 1 - 2 Nakashima
49
Rank
21
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
87
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
60% (550-370)
Career Total W/L
61% (184-116)
23% (3-10)
YTD W/L
72% (26-10)
$4,736,130
Career Prize Money
$1,608,265
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Evans | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 5 |
| Games Won | 29 | 39 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:58 | 1:55:58 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (137/231) | 57% (123/214) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (82/137) | 70% (86/123) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (52/94) | 58% (53/91) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 40% (10/25) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (75/214) | 42% (97/231) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Brandon Nakashima
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 6-0 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Evans | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 23% (3/10) | 72% (26/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (11/22) | 68% (54/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (145/179) | 55% (439/362) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.71 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 278 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:55 | 1:44:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.31 | 294.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (579/1015) | 65% (1625/2494) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (409/579) | 75% (1222/1625) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (225/436) | 57% (498/869) |
| BPs Won% Total | 30% (22/74) | 34% (73/217) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (352/1039) | 37% (976/2634) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (2/6) | 67% (4/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (19/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (3/12) | 71% (25/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/7) | 71% (12/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 40% (5/2) | 88% (25/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 60% (5/3) | 12% (25/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 30% (10/3) |
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Daniel Evans
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
12
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Daniel Evans
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Roman Safiullin
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Evans Vs Nakashima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
